Talk:Fosters Home For Imaginary Friends

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles

Animation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles

from VfD:

This is nonsense. Funny nonsense. But nonsense. Or it could be a vanity... Smoddy | Talk 20:37, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete or Move to BJAODN. --Death phoenix 21:07, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Strong Keep This is a show currently running on Cartoon Network, as mentioned. Needs work, and should maybe be moved to Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, but it IS a real show and, IMHO, relevant. Just occured to me that Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends exists, and there doesn't seem to be anything here mergeable. Changing to Delete --InShaneee 21:12, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. Sean Curtin 22:14, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, fiction, not an article. Wyss 22:46, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. There's already a good extant article and the lack of an apostrophe in "Fosters" might be a common misspelling of the title. Whoever wrote the article probably typed the title incorrectly in the first place and filled in the resulting red link. - Lucky 6.9 22:51, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect.Cookiecaper 23:22, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. Rossami (talk) 23:43, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. Megan1967 00:27, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. Samaritan 21:27, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Redirect. Please note that this was not nonsense, or fiction; it was instead information about a fiction which unfortunately neglected to note its context. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:37, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

end moved discussion