Talk:Jatiya Sangsad Bhaban

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hi People,

First thanks to Ragib for starting this article. I created a basic structure to this article and used outer resources and my own knowledge to create a good start point to make this an article worth being featured! :)

Please feel free to let me know of any edits you think are necessary. Kindly avoid deleting entire sections totally. Instead, put ideas in the discussion before taking major actions.

Urnonav 08:51, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think adding some more photos would be better. Also, a link to a poster of the Latest Movie on Louis Kahn (I was told that the movie poster features the Sangshad bhaban). --Ragib 10:09, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Should we not add the information that our Sangsad Bhaban has been awarded some precious prizes for outstanding architecture?- Auyon 5 July 2006


CC image[edit]

Try Image:Jatiyo Sangshad Bhaban - everymosquito.jpg

Keith D. Tyler [AMA] 22:51, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

File:Sangshad 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Sangshad 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Jatiyo Sangsad Bhaban. There seems to be consensus that this is the correct title and the original was an incorrect transliteration. -- tariqabjotu 15:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Jatiyo Sangshad BhabanJatiyo Shangshad Bhaban – ″Sangshad″ is a wrong transliteration of bengali ″সংসদ″. [1] Samudrakula (talk) 21:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom.  Brendon is here 08:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. You should give some evidence for the 'right' transliteration and also why it should be applied here. Given that [2] uses 'sangsad', that the article itself transliterates it differently, I don't think there is enough evidence so far to justify any move. (The preceding copied from my similar response to the parallel move request at Talk:Jatiyo_Sangshad) Imc (talk) 07:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Transliteration above is incorrect too. "স" is "S", "শ" is "Sh". Move to "Jatiyo Sangsad Bhaban", per this (see their spelling in "Sangsad bulletin"), this (see spelling "Sangsad Compound") and this (all Bangladesh Gov sites) --TitoDutta 04:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose- Tito is right. Everything Tito said is right. But per one thing this page's first line shows shangshad. But in the last line it's again Sangsad. Also every page shows it as Sangsad. So I think the first line is a typo. But I'll talk with a person who knows about this. Till then this is my comment. Also I think the Sangshad isn't right. It should be moved to Sangsad--Pratyya (Hello!) 08:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Agree with Imc, Tito, Pratyya. --Aftab1995 (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jatiya Sangsad Bhaban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jatiya Sangsad Bhaban. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]