User talk:Belgarath TS

Welcome Back!

I see you are back to editing. Good! Welcome back! Paul, in Saudi (talk) 13:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

 Thanks Belgarath TS (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: Paul Revere

Sorry for removing your section, but I'd like to keep this whole ruckus as quiet as possible.

In terms of protection, we don't do that to talk pages unless the vandalism can't be solved by simple reversions and blocks. In this case, it's not bad. Thanks for the suggestion, though! m.o.p 02:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I undid that edit. It's not a ruckus, and the section is not loud. If a large, organized, politically-motivated group are embarking on a revisionist history campaign, then people had darn well better be told about it. 94.222.185.233 (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

There's a reason administrators exist - it's to deal with all the revisionists and editors who have agendas without disturbing the regular flow of information on an article. Please, just let us deal with this. m.o.p 14:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

I want it to eb made clear that Im not the guy who responded above or reverted your edit. I suspect somebody on one of teh sides for that palin thing was either attempting to support me, or was attempting to make it look like I had become hostile as form of revenge for warning the admins. Not sure, but either way it was not me. Belgarath TS (talk) 20:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I thought I had, thanks for catching it.. bot? Belgarath TS (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

PJ Wiki

You reverted my valid edits on the Phoenix Jones page. You are adding writing that is not sourced at all. You are in blatant violation to NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelJPierce (talk • contribs) 04:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Not at all, the issue was that you didn't quote anything and it looked like you whee trying to say it was NPOV when what you really said went against what you were quoting. I tried to add part of teh artical, but if it needs additions feel free, and thank you. Belgarath TS (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Additionally it could be said that you violated NPOV by making that edit too positive, and thus violated NPOV by making it more of an advertisement. Belgarath TS (talk) 04:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

The problem is the sources. There is plenty of criticism out there for you to add, but you are REMOVING information that has been presented in Media. I have not removed your statements (even when you leave them uncited for half the day). MichaelJPierce (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm not removing anything knowingly, unless its unsourced and part of the advertisement issue as there seems to be some people attacking the page by trying to remove only negative things, or by acting as vandals (who I have reverted, even when it was negative against PJ, so you know I am NPOV), and that is why its protected. If you could point out what the issue is I would be happy to respond. Belgarath TS (talk) 05:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)