Talk:Period 5 element

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Group 3 element which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:15, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplicity of stable isotopes[edit]

The Periodic 5 element section of the table is where the individual elements are able to each have the maximum number of stable isotopes. Although the first oddZ start out with very few, or none in the case of 43Tc Technetium, The evenZ are noted to have a large number. 50Sn Tin has 10 and 54Xe Xenon has nine and 48Cd Cadmium and 52Te Tellurium have 8. 54Xe Xenon only misses being stable at Atomic number 127 by a slight margin of stability compared to 53I Iodine (I=-88903 vs Xe=-88321),`which permits the stability and thus existence of 53I Iodine's only stable isotope. At the end of the period 5 elements, the stability of the isotopes is noted to be reduced in quantity for about 5 element numbers leading up the monisotopic element 59Pr Praseodymium and later with 61Pm Promethium. which has no stable isotopes.WFPM (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Period 5 element. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]