Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11th millennium
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 21:47, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
11th millennium[edit]
I'm not convinced of the need for this one. No scope for expansion for, oh, 7995 years or so. Grutness|hello? 
01:09, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Dsmdgold 02:06, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for now, but list on Wikipedia:Requested_articles with a note to recreate and expand in 7995 years. Barno 03:33, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: It's a definition at best. --Fuzzball! (talk) 04:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Go ahead and Redirect to Future. That's what they did for 11th millennium AD and 12th millennium AD. Dave the Red (talk) 05:09, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect, concur with Dave the Red. --bainer 05:34, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect although the most useful topic an encyclopedia could cover is the future. Klonimus 02:18, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but I guess that means I have to ditch my plans to write the entry about the upcoming 10,404 US Presidential Election. Arkyan 10:13, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - there has SOME useful info which can be added (example offhand, though not relevant to this entry directly: Doctor Who reference from episode 2 "The End of the World" - the New Roman Empire in 12005). It is however reasonable that we should only keep millennial pages when there are references which can be added. --ThomasWinwood 14:17, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.