Talk:Intelligence

Intelligence was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 5, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
May 10, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
September 13, 2014	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Delisted good article

Psychology Top‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology High‑importance

	Biology portal Intelligence is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy High‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 500 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Intelligence as seen by other cultures[edit]

This article needs an addition that describes how other cultures conceive of intelligence

Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following recent title to further reading :

Holm-Hadulla, Rainer M.; Funke, Joachim; Wink, Michael (2022). Intelligence - Theories and Applications, London, Berlin, New York: Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-04197-6. source: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-04198-3 Homoscribens (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. Please provide rationale and secondary sources establishing noteworthiness. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2022[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I'd like to add to "Intelligence - Further Reading":

Rainer M. Holm-Hadulla, Joachim Funke, Michael Wink: Intelligence - Theories and Applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland 2022; ISBN 978-3-031-04197-6. Kreativität und Intelligenz (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Looks like this is a duplicate of a previous edit request; please establish noteworthiness as requested by ScottishFinnishRadish. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genes for intelligence[edit]

Why was what I wrote reverted? 12.110.37.3 (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Grayfell: 12.110.37.3 (talk) 03:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, this is the source:

Deary, Ian (2021). "Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences". Molecular Psychiatry. Here, we summarise and critique the last 10 years or so of molecular genetic (DNA-based) research on intelligence, including the discovery of genetic loci associated with intelligence

The added content was overly-broad and misrepresented the source, and it wasn't clear why this would belong in the lead of the article. Additionally, saying "already" is editorializing language which misrepresents the study to imply a degree of importance and obviousness which is not supported by the source, and again, wouldn't necessarily belong in the lead even if it were. Grayfell (talk) 04:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

marks remove 27.114.165.106 (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]