Talk:Vaginal Davis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BungeeJump. Peer reviewers: Callmepapa, Rojopastel, Heyisdeedeehome.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

See Talk:Bliss Blood/delete for the archived deletion debate on this article. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 19:09, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

---

So it's a "she" but a "drag queen"? So is this person a male who dresses as a female, or a female dressed as a male, or is there some new definition, here?

Shouldn't "she" be a "he"?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgw (talk • contribs) 21:51, 3 October 2005 (UTC)‎[reply]

Vaginal Davis refers to herself as "she", her biological sex is male (we all can just asume), she dresses in male or female codes or none codes at all: She just dresses. User:tarion23

There is no "biological sex" since she is intersex. //Mio, 2015-01-10
It should be changed, because regardless of what he thinks he is a he. It is all about gender and social construction, and socially he is a he.
False. A drag queen should always be referred to with female pronouns, unless the individual is being discussed outside of their character role. Feather Jonah (talk) 05:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See MOS:IDENTITY

Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the gendered nouns, pronouns, and possessive adjectives that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life. Nevertheless, avoid confusing or seemingly logically impossible text that could result from pronoun usage (for example: instead of He gave birth to his first child, write He became a parent for the first time).

–Temporal User (Talk) 01:27, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

updated[edit]

i made some updates, gave a more complete overview (but by no means comprehensive) and include some sources for criticism on vaginal davis's work. i am the author of the second text. this is just to give those of you who don't know davis's work, or her importance to performance art, somewhere to turn for more reliable information. davis, by the way, really goes by "vaginal davis", "ms. davis" and sometimes, "dr. davis". she dropped the "creme" a while ago. and i go back and forth between "him/he" and "her/she". it's terrific that someone started a page for her.

Fair use rationale for Image:Vaginal Davis record.jpg[edit]

Image:Vaginal Davis record.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Student Peer Review The article demonstrates a good range of information about the subject. However, it takes a point form structure which detracts from its readability, it could benefit from a more flowing structure. The organization of the article is disjointed at times, it follows a timeline structure intercut with biography and opinion from other parties which is important as content of the biography itself, but again affects its readability. The film/discography section is very well documented, it gives a sense of the range of the subject's work in different fields pointed out in the biography sections. Callmepapa (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Student review: rojopastel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.117.249.81 (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Hey there,[reply]

Really like this article, there was a lot of good information. There was a good variety of information on Davis from personal, to career wise. It was a good idea as well to break down the career section by year to easier be able to focus on what Davis was doing throughout different points in time, and their career. Perhaps. Reading the article however, I was unsure of what pronoun may be appropriate. It may be worth stating how they identify, or whether they have a specific pronoun that is preferred. Also, thoughout the article it may be useful to mention Davis' relationship to some of the different names that are brought up. The chronicling of Davis' life and how the move to Germany was influential was really well documented. The sections about Davis' work, appearance, filmography etc was really comprehensive as well. Overall, really great article. I made a few very minor edits, mostly just to spelling/grammar errors i found.

Updating information.[edit]

Hello, my name is Carly and I'm a student at SUNY New Paltz taking a class on Performing Feminism. I would like to suggest that this page be updated with several more recent events that Ms. Davis has spoken at, such as the Creative Time Summit in Washington, D.C. and MobileAcademy, a conference on disability. I also believe that the page could use some basic punctuation corrections, and am interested in improving this article myself in the future for a class assignment Heyisdeedeehome (talk) 22:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vaginal Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Birth place[edit]

Davis's birth place should be included in the article, as the personal life section only says that her birth date is private.

Davis' identity: transgender or not?[edit]

I removed 4 categories from the article, that categorizes transgender people:

I believe there is no reliable source to verify the claim that she is transgender.

She is non-binary and intersex, but she is not transgender.

When one or more reliable sources are found, they can be provided in this discussion.

Otherwise, the status quo remains. — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 17:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vaginal_Davis&oldid=1198706516"