User talk:Kadzuwo~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, Kadzuwo. Thank you for the work you've been doing around the site. Judging from the work you've done, it seems that your forte is in Asian culture; if you'll be continuing to contribute, you can find some articles in need of help in this field or on other topics at Wikipedia:Pages needing attention.

You might find these links helpful in starting new articles or helping with existing ones: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, you can see the help pages, or, for individual help, feel free to add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

  • You can sign your name on talk pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Thank you for your contributions; I hope you continue to help us.

-- Djinn112 03:16, Feb 23, 2004 (UTC)

NPOV[edit]

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia also. It would be a good idea for you to read up on NPOV before editing controversial pages. Also, the Japanese wikipedia could do with a lot more contributors. :) Markalexander100 02:32, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I already read it at Japanese version. So, I'm always trying to show my fucktardedness. Thank you.Kadzuwo 10:36, 7 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Kadzuwo, the article will have two sides represented - one defending the book and its claims and the other representing is problems. Do not attempt to censor material from being in the article, rather present a complete case against its claims under a subheading. Thank you. - SV(talk) 01:23, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Nomination of Honolulu University for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Honolulu University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honolulu University until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Brandon (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

01:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

14:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]