Talk:Portugal national football team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Statistics[edit]

Spanish Wikipedia has 3-3 as the scoreline in the first international, and 8-0 as the worst defeat by England. Then German Wikipedia has 3-1 as the first international scoreline, but 8-0 as the worst defeat. Can a definitive answer be found? Portugal were defeated 10-0 by England in 1947

National colours[edit]

Am I the only one seeing the home and away colours of the national team in gray? The green and yellow lines are ok, but the rest of the shirt is gray, instead of dark red. Can anyone solve this please? Joaopais 02:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is, indeed, black (or, at least, a very dark gray—which is what is in the kit; black is #000000 and we have #111111). Take a look at the FPF website. :) —Rotring 18:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is a Internet Explorer / Mozilla compatibility problem - just like the Danish national football team kits which also have grey colours. Poulsen 18:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What can we do to solve this? I'm going to revert to the all-red/all-black kits, meanwhile. Joaopais 01:21, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, IE fucks it all up, because it does not support PNG transparency. Solution: GIFs. --Rotring 19:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why cant this page be protected[edit]

Firstly thanks to everyone that has worked dilligently to keep the content of this page free of edits by morons today. The pages for Wayne Rooney and Ronaldo are semi protected so why the hell can't this page also be semi protected. The vandalism surely must warrant it? Why can those pages get a semi protect and this page not? Adam777 22:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request it at WP:RFPP. -- Steel 22:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I put in the request at RFP two days ago; Adam777 replied to it. The request is now apparently gone and not listed as either fulfilled or denied. Gimmetrow 23:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When Adam777 replied to it, the bot which clears furfilled requests thought that an admin had responded and action had been taken, see here. Submit another request. -- Steel 23:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Adam, you made your request in the wrong place, I've moved it for you. -- Steel 23:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so we shouldn't respond to RfP requests? If so, oops, I replied to Adam's. Gimmetrow 23:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page is now semi-protected. KillerChihuahua?!? 16:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone really needs to fix this page. I don't know if I have the rights (or the correct knowledge) to do so. Some hooligan really got hold of it.--Horsenbuggy 17:11, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections to be made, please[edit]

  • The nickname is Quinas (the five shields on the flag.
  • The home and away colors are Very Wrong. Its all red and all black, respectively, 134.93.181.159 10:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal did play quite badly in the Semi-Final, but regardless of who plays better or worse, the ref did a crappy job. There were many fouls done by the french were were completely ignored. Cristiano Ronaldo's dive would've been the move for a header but he was pushed. It is impossible to jump straight up in the air and then fly forwards unless you're strapped to a jetpack. Even if Portugal would've lost anyway they deserved a fair game.


I've saw a lot of anti-portuguese feelings on this page before. Surely some hooligan (maybe wainr rooney :)) did it. There are two reasons for this type of hate: 1. Portugal knock England out of the World Cup. 2. Portugal is a latin country. SOME (not all) English hate Latins. Congratulations to the English people that are noble enough not to vandalize this page, and to put it in order.


I hope I'm in the right area to make these observations:

  • 1984 was NOT the first time Portugal entered the Euros. In 1960 the beat East Germany in round one and went out in the quarters to Serbia. In 1964, Bulgaria knocked them out in the first round in a replay. In 1968, 1972, 1976 and 1980 they failed to get out of the (new approach) qualifying groups.

210.54.6.37 (talk) 03:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Michael.[reply]

Starting Lineup and formation[edit]

Wouldn't it be better to have a more representative lineup of the squad, other than the Germany 3rd place match? Ricardo Costa never plays on the starting 11, Miguel is usually prefered to Paulo Ferreira, Pauleta is now retiring... Maybe if we're removing retiring players we should wait for the Euro 2008 qualifiers though. --Noikeee 16:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Protection[edit]

I only ask that Mr. Rocha respects that others might have a different opinion. He claims that the admission by Ricardo Carvalho that he touched Henry is proof that it was a foul - even if the touch was never enough to trip Henry, or to stop him from getting to the ball. But then he insists that another touch, Cristiano Ronaldo being pushed from behind and changing trajectory in middle jump, is just a dive. Besides the contradicting views, that is his opinion, and also (unfortunately) the opinion of the referee of the game. It isn't mine, and it isn't the opinion of most Portuguese supporters (and even other nationals have admitted both are disputed). I mostly don't agree with Mr. Rocha imposing his opinion as the ultimate truth, and not admitting he doesn't own the truth, he is just expressing his views. Also, about his attacks on my anonymous posting, I didn't know it had been forbidden in Wikipedia's charter. After all, it's very easy to know my ip, so it isn't truly anonymous (even if this IP is being used by over a 1000 others). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.234.134.115 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Mr Anoymous is untitled to his opinions, but not to his own facts. Besides, since Mr. Anonymous posting history consists mainly of slandering his pet hate FC Porto and whoever is connected to it, and calling it "fact", I don't have a lot of respect for his (or her) "opinions". In fact, I've none. I've also not a lot of pacience to bad losers in general, and I'm afraid my country is full of them. Mr. Anonymous would like Portugal to win the cup, so do I. But they were beaten by a better team, fair and square, and to say it doesn't make me less Portuguese, and I won't take lessons in Portugueseness from either Mr. Anonymous, Mr. Scolari or Mr. Madaíl. To claim that I celebrated the Greek victory with champagne is nothing more than the usual slander coming from Mr. Anonymous.

Now, for facts: Ricardo Carvalho's foul did exist (and I notice that Mr. Anonymous started by saying the touch didn't even exist, and only changed opinion when it was pointed out that Ricardo Carvalho himself admited the foul; only then did Mr. Anonymous change his tone to "the foul existed but it was not enough"). It was inside the area. Therefore, it was a penalty. Henry got the most of it? Of course he did, but that doesn't change the fact the foul existed. As for Cristiano Ronaldo, he is an excellent player. That's the reason why I wanted to kick him: for spending to much time diving --(he's not that good at it) instead of playing (he's good at that). And to touch a player that he is already falling (as the French defender did) is not a foul. In short, the referee got it right, Mr. Anonymous got it wrong. --Explendido Rocha 15:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Strange how you keep confusing facts with your interpretation of them, and keep denying that others might have a different opinion. I won't even answer your insults, there's no point. I apologized for mine already, even if they were provoked by yours.

Fact: Ricardo Carvalho admitted touching Henry. I didn't believe it until I read his interview, as it is not visible in the video. I admitted I was wrong. A touch isn't the same as a foul, even if it is inside the area - if it were so, every corner kick would be followed by a penalty. But I guess you won't agree with me on this too.

My opinion: The touch wasn't enough to trip Henry. He dived.
Your opinion: it was enough to trip Henry, but Henry "got the most of it".
Conclusion: we don't agree, it's a dispute to who is right. More people agree with me, as we can see from the postings here. Also obviously more people agree with you, including the referee.
Final conclusion: it's a disputed penalty. Nobody agrees.
Fact: Cristiano Ronaldo is touched when jumping, and changes trajectory in mid-air.
My opinion: He was pushed from behind, as can be seen by his trajectory changing.
Your opinion: he was touched when "he is already falling". I've never seen someone falling upwards, but you're free to have that opinion. Again, we have a dispute here, and some people side with me, some side with you.

You assume your opinions are facts. Others have not, and both fouls were considered disputed until you edited this page and entered a edit war with me.

My opinion: Your insults and intolerant attitude are just to try to provoke me into another round of insults and a edit war.

Since you didn't even consider my arguments, and just went ahead and edited the page to follow your opinion and your interpretation of the facts, I feel that might just be your game, to see that you can get this page to be semi-protected so I'll have to register to edit it (then what is your plan after that, ban my login for not agreeing with you?). I won't register until the wikipedia charter bans anonymous postings. I won't even justify or explain why. I'll just think what am I going to do next, either let your presumptuous attitude win, or try and edit back the page and hope you'll be reasonable. 195.234.134.115 16:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: just abid to WP:V and WP:RS. Any disputed content on Wikipedia can be removed if no sources are provided to back it. Also, please sign all your comments, the discussion gets hard to follow otherwise. And last but not least, please always keep a cool head and be WP:CIVIL. I'm monitoring this article and will re-protected it if the edit war restarts so please try to settle your differences here. Thank you. Regards.--Húsönd 17:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's any point. It's a matter of faith for Mr. Anonymous, and faith can't be discussed. My version is perfectly correct - the penalty is contested by some Portuguese; I've checked sources in different languages, and not even Brazilian sources, who would be pro-Scolari, present that penalty as contested. That Ricardo Carvalho admitted is a fact. And in those circunstances there aren't small fouls and big fouls. There are penalties, and nobody but some Portuguese who are the very definition of bad loser contest it.
As to Cristiano Ronaldo, again, my version is perfectly correct; nobody but some Portuguese (and, in this case, I doubt they are even a majority) thinks that it was anything else but a dive, but perhaps Mr. Anonymous is right and Cristiano Ronaldo would manage to violate some of the laws of physics. Again, what shall we add? Mr. Anonymous afirmation that Ronaldo was pushed? He went down in the box, all right, but to say that he was pushed is a strong contention, not validated by fact.
So, what we have: Mr. Anonymous wants the world to think that Portugal was robbed. He also probably thinks that the referre hit João Pinto's fist with his belly. Mr. Anonymous tries to present it as a matter of opinion, as in "my opinion is that the moon is made of green cheese". It is not, it is a matter of fact. But it is well know the facts of that game have a anti-Portuguese bias.
Finally, if Mr. Anonymous wants to play the virgin and feel insulted, I couldn't care less. Perhaps he should dedicate himself to write less slander and more valid contributions - he is a poster boy for why anonymous contributions shouldn't be allowed. --Explendido Rocha 18:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It's always nice to have a offer to dialog received in such a friendly way. Let's see if I understand Mr. Rocha's points:
If he doesn't agree, what I'm saying is a matter of faith;
Those who don't agree with him are "the very definition of bad loser";
If Henry is touched and "makes the best of it" it's a penalty, if Ronaldo is touched and changes direction in mid-jump it's a dive;
It's ok to lie and claim that Ricardo Carvalho admitted a foul, when he just admitted touching Henry, if that helps making a point; check the interview he linked for what Ricardo Carvalho said.
If he agrees, it's a fact, if not, it's opinion - when what we are arguing about are interpretations of specific facts; neither he or me can give what was the force applied on Cristiano and if it was enough to make him fall, or prove that Henry could have kept going if he didn't "make the best of it" when Ricardo Carvalho touched him; we can only interpret what we saw on the tv (or at the stadium);
It's ok to attack other's character in order to discredit their point of view;
Only virgins feel insulted when called slanderers or when having their opinions dismissed with a plain "because I say so".
He's a prolific poster and I'm not, so he's obviously right and I'm wrong;
Anonymous writers (and probably anyone else he doesn't agree with) shouldn't be allowed to contribute to the wikipedia;
Also, it's implied from this that previous editors of this page who agreed that both decisions were disputed are obviously "bad losers" and acting out of faith.
You know what I feel worst about? Not that he tries to blanket that the referee had different criteria for Portuguese and for French at that game. What I don't like at all is that one of my country representatives here is such a conceived, presumptuous individual that thinks any other Portuguese that doesn't agree with him is a bad loser. 195.234.134.115 09:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We lost. I got over it, you should too. --Explendido Rocha 11:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If by getting over it you mean getting in a edit war with whomever you don't agree, ok. A Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you too. 195.234.134.115 14:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop playing the virgin, you aren't good at it. --Explendido Rocha 10:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep abiding to WP:CIVIL, you're really good at it. 195.234.134.115 16:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only civil to civilized people. If you are offended, good. --Explendido Rocha 19:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You see, that is another difference between you and me; besides the fact that I have a life and a job and don't have all the free time you have to contribute to the wikipedia, I try to be civil to everyone, even lying bastards who pretend that touching is the same as hitting or tripping someone. It takes someone as arrogant as you to make me lose my temper, as can be seen by all this exchange. But you can gloat now, your rudeness, your arrogant ways and your distortion of the facts to suit your view of the world have convinced me to leave. You won, keep your wikipedia and have lots of fun. 195.234.134.115 16:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Leva a bicicleta. --Explendido Rocha 11:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biggest Defeat[edit]

September 27, 1953, Vienna, Austria - Austria 9 - 1 Portugal (1954 FIFA World Cup qualification Group 5) Wouldn't this be considered Portugal's biggest defeat or at least be tied with the current "Portugal 2 - 8 England" stated? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.64.201.157 (talkcontribs). at 2007-03-10T21:21:41

The biggest defeat is a 0-10 with England (not 2-8) and someone corrected that already. Still that was a friendly match and I do believe that the largest competitive match defeat should be included. Still that is, I think, a 9-0 at Spain, not the 9-1 at Austria. Done that. - Nabla 21:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need for differentiating competitive and friendly matches, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/National teams for further details. Martin tamb 03:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, and thanks for the link. Anyway I see nothing there stating neither that friendlies should or should not be differentiated from competitive matches. Still it is somehow implied in the template. I still think they are worth differentiating, but I'll raise the issue there then. Enjoy! - Nabla 15:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Captain[edit]

Recently, I changed the captain on the infobox from Cristiano Ronaldo into Jorge Andrade. Here's my reason for the changes:

After the international retirement of Luis Figo on July 2006, Costinha was appointed captain and captained Portugal for 4 matches in September and October 2006. He is absent on November 2006 match and Nuno Gomes was stand-in captain on that match. On February 2007, Cristiano Ronaldo was the captain for a friendly match, but according to this report, Luiz Felipe Scolari said that he only became captain as a gesture to the late Carlos Silva (vice-president of Portuguese FA). Then on March 2007 matches, Jorge Andrade captained the team, while Ronaldo also playing. Since Costinha haven't been called up since October 2006 for technical reason (he did not has injuries that prevent him for being called up), and Andrade seems to be certain in starting line-up when fit (he just return to the national team in November 2006 after a long injury layoff), I would say Andrade is first on the captain list, with probably Ronaldo and Nuno Gomes as vice-captain.

Feel free to comment on my opinion here. Martin tamb 09:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kuwait match[edit]

I have read recent reports like this that suggest Portugal did not play against Kuwait. Instead they played a Kuwaiti club Al Salmiya Club. If this is true, the caps from this game were not included since FIFA rules does not consider friendly against club side as an official match. However, Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) official website did register the players' caps from this game. Also from seeing the Kuwait lineup from this page, I was pretty sure that this is not their national team, because Bashar Abdullah of Kuwait has already retired from international football. This issue has happen before when Brazil national football team came to Kuwait to play Al Kuwait Kaifan, and the caps from that match was not counted. So could we delete players' caps from that match? Martin tamb 19:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't post sources for this, but it is said that FIFA sanctioned this game as an official international friendly. The Kuwait football federation delegated the task of international representation to Al Salmiya. Parutakupiu talk || contribs 20:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for clearing things up. Yeah I also see that the match is listed in FIFA Men's National Team Fixtures and Results list and also FPF counts those caps. So I think you're right. Martin tamb 17:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kits[edit]

A user with the IP address 68.209.106.107 reverted my edit of the away kit (all white) to white shirts, white shorts and green socks. This is incorrect, FPF revealed the new away kit in November 2007 prior to the Euro 2008 qualifier in Armenia, and has white socks.

Picture taken from GettyImages

I have now reverted this edit. In addition this picture has been leaked on the Internet of the supposed new home shirt:_

Home shirt leaked pic

However I have not yet changed the kit information on the article until we have official confirmation of this kit's release - the shorts and socks have not yet been shown but I guess the shorts would be green, and the socks would be red, just like a number of previous Portugal kits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonzi9 (talkcontribs) 21:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coaches[edit]

To follow the pattern used in entries about other national teams this article could really use a table of previous coaches. The RSSSF link at the bottom of the page is dated 1999 so is now rather out of date. Can anbody do a bit of research and bring this up to speed? --Timetrial (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Portugal FPF crest.png[edit]

The image Image:Portugal FPF crest.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Someone please tell me ....[edit]

BBC just announced that the portugal squad was "ruled out" ....Is this true ???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.202.12.44 (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kit[edit]

Who messed up the kit and put white shorts?--Kanzler31 (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 World Cup Reserves[edit]

Shouldn't the 6 reserves be separated, or at least noted as so, from the 24 called up? BrickBreak (talk) 22:11, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Positions[edit]

Pepe is a DC not a MF.

Well done, but keep it encyclopedic please[edit]

Congratulations from Holland to Portugal on an impressive victory!

However, please try to keep this article (and possibly related ones) somewhat neutral. There have already been two WP:NPOV edits (both assuming good faith, I presume) within half an hour after the match.

Thank you. Skysmurf (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honors[edit]

It states that the listed honors are for the senior Portuguese national team, yet the fourth place finish at the 1996 Olympics is listed. Olympics football has been U-23 since 1992. On the same time, is fourth place really an honor? Because finishing outside the top three isn't a podium finish therefore fourth place isn't really an honor. This also goes to the listed fourth place finish at the 2006 World Cup. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Size / Split[edit]

This article is quite long at over 100 kilobytes. Wiki article size guidelines say that articles over 60kB should be divided. I plan to create a History of the Portugal national football team article. I will move certain content from the main article — much of the material from the History, Kit History, and Previous Squads, and Managers sections — into the History article. I wanted to give readers some warning before big chunks of this article start moving over. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quaresma is not going to Brazil[edit]

It says here that he is. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • That page has simply not been updated Rui, i saw the callup live on TV yesterday, he has not been selected. His only chance now is if there is an injury to an attacking player of the 23 before the tournament.

Attentively --AL (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Historic broadcasters[edit]

Could some please add in the historic broadcasters of the Portugal national football team? Add them on the media coverage section. Wonderwizard (talk) 14:50, August 22 2014 (UTC)

European championship final standings[edit]

Please change the placings in the Euro championships, as there are no 4th places! There's no 3rd place game, both semifinalists get the 3rd place! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.136.37.24 (talk) 02:14, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do they get medals? If they don't, it's not an honour. SLBedit (talk) 11:35, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dmy or mdy dates?[edit]

In my opinion the article should use {{use dmy dates}}. SLBedit (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: add wealth and population adjusted Elo rating below FIFA and Elo rating[edit]

Portugal is ranked #3 [1] --Abejones (talk) 21:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

More inline citations[edit]

The article needs more inline citations in the History section and others, so please stop removing the {{More footnotes}} template (like this), especially the user evading a block, using multiple accounts and IP addresses, and editing while logged out (this and this). SLBedit (talk) 17:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Era[edit]

I think, and it is just an opinion, that a sub-heading should be the Cristiano Ronaldo era, because of his role in Portuguese glory.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 06:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All-time results[edit]

In my opinion, that source might not be the most reliable one since the numbers are a bit different of the ones obtained in Coaching history section (As of 1 September 2021: 633 Played - 305 Won - 150 Drawn - 178 Lost in Coaching history all added up vs. 640 Played (I counted them and the correct number according to their data is 639) - 309 Won - 150 Drawn - 180 Lost in worldfootball.net).

Like I said the numbers don't differ that much, but until a more reliable source be found I suggest that this section should be deleted. XMillennium94x (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Edit requests concerning "Penaldo" showing on Google[edit]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2022[edit]

Why does Searching Portugal National Team in Google says " Captain: Cristiano Penaldo"?? I hope this gets removed as quickly as possible DebjoyCR7 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DebjoyCR7: Google pulls in data from Wikipedia periodically and the latest data pull happened while the article was vandalized. It's something that happens occasionally and there's really nothing we can do about it. I suppose you could contact Google, but Google's machine learning is not anything we have control over. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 13:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2022[edit]

Kindly Remove portugal national captain name from 'Cristiano penaldo' To ' Cristiano Ronaldo' 51.223.106.18 (talk) 18:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Nothing to do here. There's no mention of "Penaldo" anywhere in the article. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 18:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2022[edit]

Some editors put Cristiano Ronaldo's name to Penaldo..It's not right...Change to his actual name of the front... 103.138.172.60 (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Nothing to do here. There's no mention of "Penaldo" anywhere in the article. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 18:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2022 (2)[edit]

Wolves first team 82.39.115.188 (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022[edit]

Captain name should be ronaldo not penalty. 2607:FB91:BD1F:C69C:C9CF:6ADD:FA2D:6A99 (talk) 01:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (2)[edit]

The captain of Portugal Men's Football team is Cristiano Ronaldo, not Cristiano Penaldo. I want you to make this small but significant "error." 103.174.84.77 (talk) 08:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (3)[edit]

2409:4073:86:34DA:0:0:16D0:E0A0 (talk) 09:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.Kpddg (talk contribs) 10:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (4)[edit]

Change the captain from “Cristiano Penaldo” to Cristiano Ronaldo 72.255.7.145 (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Already done Kpddg (talk contribs) 10:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (5)[edit]

Captain of Portugal national football team is shown here as “Cristiano Penaldo” while his actual name is ‘Cristiano Ronaldo’ most famous person in the world. Please understand the mistake and do the necessities. 2409:4073:381:20B6:39CF:8C69:B1E0:94D5 (talk) 11:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done There is no mention of "Penaldo" anywhere in the article. If there is, please point it out here. Kpddg (talk contribs) 12:13, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

The wiki page of Portugal fc is still vandalised Under the tag of Captain; Cristiano "Penaldo" 2402:3A80:E1E:CD6B:0:16:22DE:4601 (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not. Please read the page. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 13:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enterin the Wikipedia it shows the Portugal football team captain as Cristiano penaldo, I believe it will change as soon[edit]

Change Portugal captain name as Cristiano Ronaldo Rahulkcheemeni (talk) 13:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahulkcheemeni Nothing to correct. Please look at the page before making unnecessary edit requests. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 13:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (6)[edit]

Captain's Name is Cristiano Ronaldo not penaldo ...Some messi stans might have editted it in. 49.15.208.208 (talk) 14:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See above similar requests, this is not a problem with the article. Kpddg (talk contribs) 14:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit "penaldo"[edit]

Ronaldo is the captain 2402:3A80:19FE:ADAE:0:0:0:2 (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (7)[edit]

The team captain is wrongly written as "Cristiano Penaldo" this is blatant disrespect to Cristiano Ronaldo and it's shameful that a platform such as Wikipedia has done this. Change this asap 49.205.212.72 (talk) 15:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 (8)[edit]

157.40.113.19 (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unclear what change is required. (But I'm sure we can guess) - X201 (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Increase in number of 'Penaldo' edit requests[edit]

A lot of IPs have requested that 'Penaldo' be changed to Ronaldo, despite clarifying that there is no such error. Should something be done here? Kpddg (talk contribs) 12:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpddg It's definitely annoying because there's absolutely nothing to do here since Google's A.I. does what it wants. I have created a new parent cat to house all the IP edit requests. I am curious to see if the talk page can be locked, though that could potentially be harmful to editors who have legitimate edit requests and other concerns. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 13:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok, so that's the problem @Adeletron 3030:. I kept wondering where so many people were seeing 'Penaldo'. I don't think the page can be locked though. Hope the problem gets fixed soon. Kpddg (talk contribs) 14:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's one more request now! I think something should be done about this. Kpddg (talk contribs) 14:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How about a large, temporary Edit Notice? - X201 (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I had in mind...

- X201 (talk) 15:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine and good, but no one will read it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this can be posted on the top of this page. Kpddg (talk contribs) 05:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I'm suggesting. Go to Niko Bellic and click edit to see how I'm suggesting it should appear. - X201 (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not needed now. Google has updated. - X201 (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 March 2022[edit]

In the 1938 FIFA World Cup qualification, the Seleção played one game against syria

Please add a full stop to the end of this sentence, capitalise "Syria", and add a link to Syria national football team. 49.198.51.54 (talk) 19:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved That was actually a factual error and a carriage return in the middle of the sentence. The error has been there uncorrected since December, so thanks for pointing that out. I've undone the edit and tweaked the sentence. Adeletron 3030 (talkedits) 20:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2022[edit]

copy   Duplicate proposal

Please add this information after the part speaking about the 1966 World cup. It's missing information on the article:

"Portugal missed out on qualifying for the 1970 World Cup after finishing last in a group consisting of Romania, Greece and Switzerland." 66.152.104.82 (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
here is the link http://www.planetworldcup.com/CUPS/1970/wc70qualification.html
Also it's already on wikipedia itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_(UEFA)
And it's available on the portugal page itself under the competitive record category. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 13:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder to follow up on this. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2022[edit]

copy   Duplicate proposal

I had submitted an edit request to add info about the 1970 World cup qualification in the history section. The moderator came back asking for resources. I had submitted the resources. This hasn't been attended till now. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When re-opening an edit request, you need to changed the |answered field in the {{edit semi-protected}} template to no, or else it won't reactivate. Keep this in mind for the future. Don't worry too much about it now, its fixed. An editor should address the request at some point. Aidan9382 (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 July 2022[edit]

copy   Duplicate proposal Fixed

Please add this information after the part speaking about the 1966 World cup. It's missing information on the article:

"Portugal missed out on qualifying for the 1970 World Cup after finishing last in a group consisting of Romania, Greece and Switzerland." 66.152.104.82 (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
here is the link http://www.planetworldcup.com/CUPS/1970/wc70qualification.html
Also it's already on wikipedia itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970_FIFA_World_Cup_qualification_(UEFA)
And it's available on the portugal page itself under the competitive record category. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 13:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder to follow up on this. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 16:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had submitted an edit request to add info about the 1970 World cup qualification in the history section. The moderator came back asking for resources. I had submitted the resources. This hasn't been attended till now. 66.152.104.82 (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Second opinion requested@ScottishFinnishRadish:@Aidan9382: Qhnbgjt (talk) 12:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any opinion, one way or another, I just made a procedural close earlier based on the lack of sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Same as scottish. I was just here to do some maintenance on the request. Aidan9382 (talk) 13:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done note that you should've used the source from rsssf which I added. Aaron Liu (talk) 04:03, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it seems that this information about the 1970 qualification has disappeared? How so? Can you please reinstate it. 83.110.192.242 (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The information about the 1970 world cup qualifiers has disappeared? Please re-add it. 66.90.196.210 (talk) 02:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Man[edit]

A man 173.23.165.105 (talk) 11:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2022[edit]

I want to edit this page to add some more content about Portugal national football team I am a sincere editor who will not promote vandalism . Regards

Vivekanand Maths — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivekanand Maths (talkcontribs) 11:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2022[edit]

David Carmo: Change the club from Braga to Porto Domingos Duarte: Change the club from Granada to Getafe


I would like to edit the clubs of some of the current players in the national team squad (some of the teams are not updated) Kikoides (talk) 01:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.zerozero.pt/player.php?id=233475 - David Carmo
https://www.zerozero.pt/player.php?id=214334 - Domingos Duarte Kikoides (talk) 14:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2022[edit]

David Carmo is a Porto player and Domingos Duarte plays for Getafe. Their old clubs are still listed. 193.136.52.11 (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2022[edit]

Replace Raphael Guerreiro with Mário Rui, who was called today (https://www.fpf.pt/pt/News/Todas-as-not%C3%ADcias/Not%C3%ADcia/news/36220) 2001:818:DF92:1F00:542D:6564:D4B1:97E4 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Guerreiro still was called up in the last 12 months and there isn't really a reason they should be removed. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2022[edit]

copy   Duplicate proposal

Mário Rui replaced Raphael Guerreiro a couple of days ago; on the "recent call-ups" section, David Carmo and Domingos Duarte still appear as Braga and Granada players, respectively, even though they've been at Porto and Getafe for almost two months now... and the federation's badge is missing! Does no one update this page correctly anymore? Does anyone updated 193.136.52.11 (talk) 09:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Guerreiro still was called up in the last 12 months and there isn't really a reason they should be removed. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The national team crest[edit]

Someone changed the national team crest to the actual flag, is that supposed to happen? 178.138.96.143 (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2022[edit]

Please i want to update people 2400:ADC5:104:9C00:918A:71A8:184:E2BC (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 01:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 November 2022[edit]

Squad numbers have come out:

1. Rui Patrício

2. Dalot

3. Pepe

4. Ruben Dias

5. Raphael Guerreiro

6. João Palhinha

7. Pristiano Penaldo

8. Bruno Fernandes

9. André Silva

10. Bernardo Silva

11. João Félix

12. José Sá

13. Danilo

14. William Carvalho

15. Raphael Leão

16. Vitinha

17. João Mário

18. Ruben Neves

19. Nuno Mendes

20. João Cancelo

21. Ricardo Horta

22. Diogo Costa

23. Matheus Nunes

24. António Silva

25. Otávio

26. Gonçalo Ramos

Source: https://maisfutebol.iol.pt/selecao/selecao-nacional/joao-felix-e-o-11-os-numeros-de-camisola-da-selecao-para-o-mundial 193.136.52.11 (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 22:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CR7 WC record[edit]

should we add the record that he scored in 5 different wcs and 5 different uefa euros? 190.172.91.196 (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2023[edit]

Noosinho (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC) I want to change the image used and a typo in one of the names of the players.[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023[edit]

Mark João Mário (in recent call ups section) as RET (retired), just like Rafa Silva. see (in portuguese) https://www.abola.pt/nnh/2023-05-28/selecao-joao-mario-renuncia-a-selecao/989672 2001:9E8:A51:9E00:9842:E102:BB5:1902 (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"change 'João Mário' to 'João Mário RET'
(in Players > Recent call-ups)
he retired from internation football. source already provided
i don't know how can i make it clearer 2001:9E8:A51:9E00:9842:E102:BB5:1902 (talk) 01:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rubèn Neves should be at Al-Hilal now.[edit]

Since Neves is at Al-Hilal now the club should be changed for that. 212.178.214.77 (talk) 06:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2023[edit]

Portugal's UEFA profile in (External links) need to update to new one: (https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/national-associations/POR/), also FIFA profile to non-archived one: (https://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/associations/POR) 154.180.3.130 (talk) 11:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Paper9oll (🔔📝) 13:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Major vs Minor cups[edit]

This article seems to classify major cups vs minor cups without any real source or reasoning. To me, undoubtedly the European Championship is a major trophy. But is the Nations League one? What about Confederations Cup? In my opinion yes, the SkyDome cup is a minor trophy, but that's just my opinion. Is there any consistent basis for this distinction? Or should they all be listed in the same category and let the reader decide what is major or minor? BlackenedTheUSSR (talk) 14:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few months have passed with no answer, I think the best thing is to put them all together unless a cited distinction for each cup exists. BlackenedTheUSSR (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2023[edit]

change 200 caps to 201 109.76.171.10 (talk) 09:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: no reason given for the proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 11:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nations League Matches[edit]

Can you add the Nations League matches for Portugal against Croatia, Poland, and Scotland?

5 September 2024 (2024-09-05) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Portugal  v  Croatia Portugal
20:45 (19:45 UTC+1) Report Stadium: TBD
8 September 2024 (2024-09-08) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Portugal  v  Scotland Portugal
20:45 (19:45 UTC+1) Report Stadium: TBD
12 October 2024 (2024-10-12) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Poland  v  Portugal Poland
20:45 Report Stadium: TBD
15 October 2024 (2024-10-15) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Scotland  v  Portugal Scotland
20:45 (19:45 UTC+1) Report Stadium: TBD
15 November 2024 (2024-11-15) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Portugal  v  Poland Portugal
20:45 (19:45 UTC±0) Report Stadium: TBD
18 November 2024 (2024-11-18) 2024-25 UEFA Nations League A Croatia  v  Portugal Croatia
20:45 Report Stadium: TBD

47.153.148.108 (talk) 22:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Away jerseys need to be changed[edit]

The new 2024 euro jerseys for away games needs to be updated 149.88.16.231 (talk) 18:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was fixed but they got the shorts wrong. They are all dark navy blue solid color, someone on here put them as white with navy blue stripe. 2601:19C:4D80:5750:5FD:E8F0:799D:90C1 (talk) 19:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image of away jersey needs to be updated[edit]

The current image shows the incorrect kit for 2024 away jersey. 2601:19C:4D80:5750:9D83:BBA3:936:E7B9 (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Away shorts are all solid color dark blue can someone fix this[edit]

There is no white away shorts with navy stripe, they are all solid color, a very dark navy blue. Socks are same color as jersey. Good job on the jersey though, it is perfect image. Thanks 2601:19C:4D80:5750:5FD:E8F0:799D:90C1 (talk) 17:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second colours shorts need to be fixed[edit]

They are solid dark navy blue colour, what currently shows on the page is incorrect with white and a navy blue stripe down the sides. Check their photos, official website for proof. 2601:19C:4D80:5750:5FD:E8F0:799D:90C1 (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second colors shorts needs to be fixed/updated to dark navy blue[edit]

Hello, the shorts for the second colors aka away kit needs to be fixed. It currently shows a white shorts with navy blue stripe but the shorts are all one solid color of dark navy blue. Can someone please fix this. I have attached sources, if you need reference just look at the images from their most recent game against Sweden on Thursday 03/21/24.. Thank you for your time.

<ref>https://www.goal.com/en-kw/lists/bruma-first-player-cristiano-ronaldo-portugal-no-7-shirt-since-2007-sweden/blte2ad7da02895ce85 /ref>

  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
  • Why it should be changed:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

2601:19C:4D80:5750:ADEE:5521:3B11:9B92 (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. This needs to be fixed 149.88.16.244 (talk) 19:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

 Already done PianoDan (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Georgia back to the Euro[edit]

The playoffs are over. Who removed it by mistake? 47.153.148.108 (talk) 15:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]