Talk:2004 Atlantic hurricane season named storms

from VfD:

Unnecessary article, duplicates information at 2004 Atlantic hurricane season, and only deals with the ones that hit the USA anyway. --Golbez 06:30, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

• This definitely doesn't need its own page. Delete. [[User:Mo0|Mo0[talk]]] 06:47, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Since it's all duplicate info anyway. --MPerel 09:52, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. It might be duplicate info, but if the other site has problems, I'm sure the others have a right to come here and see said info. Scott Gall 10:35, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
  • "Other site"? -- Cyrius|✎ 01:42, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Not sure what you're saying, Scott. Both items are entries in the same Wikipedia, not external sites. My vote is delete. It's an abortive attempt to catalog some events, but a much better job is done in the other article. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 13:23, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: DCEdwards1966 14:39, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
• Merge (or don't) and redirect. I don't see the harm in keeping a redirect, and a redirect will keep any links from outside websites from breaking. (note to anyone counting votes, merge and redirect counts as a keep, not a delete) anthony 警告 18:25, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - not useful, hasn't been in existence long enough to pick up significant outside links. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:42, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • All outside links are significant. anthony 警告 00:27, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I disagree. I also have my doubts that there are any outside pages linking to it, although I have no proof. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:52, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete -- Chuq 05:42, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• deleteMozzerati 19:15, 2004 Dec 4 (UTC)
• Redirects are your friend! -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 04:07, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion