User talk:Michal Jurosz

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 09:49, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Wikics template[edit]

Hi Michal! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.

Template:User wikics

Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it (and if you actually contribute). Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 22:27, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to Tomáš Dvořák page[edit]

Hi Michal - all I can say is they looked plausible to me. People have got used to the Google way of doing things - making a stab at the word and letting Google sort out the spelling. The Wikipedia search engine doesn't work like this - if it can't find the word you've made a stab at, it instead asks the searcher to create a new article. On subjects with accented characters, that leads to a rash of articles of very poor quality under different spellings. However, if you disagree - and you have the guidelines on your side on this, so I don't mind! - please feel free to renominate the redirects for speedy deletion. ➨ ЯEDVERS 09:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

diacriticals[edit]

Thank you for that last edit on List of Czechs . I've been searching for alt codes to make those diacritical marks with the consonants, but to no avail. Will you please point me in the right direction? I'll thank you if you do. ForDorothy 23:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ForDorothy 21:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

One was a relative of the other, not the same person. Why? Schissel | Sound the Note! 19:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. I missed their relation two times. :-(. Will be carefull next time. --mj41 21:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I over-reacted, sir, though I'm still fairly sure that they're about different people. Some of the external links in the J. A. Koželuh page referred to Leopold as I discovered while I was working on the (at the time blank) stub-article on that latter. The m:ru version of the Leopold Kozeluch article gives different dates (by much!) And I just have too much uncertainty about who's who when I think about it- it's worth thinking about. The one reason I can think of for a merge is if, as some may argue with Josef Reicha (Anton's uncle), J A Koželuh is perhaps not notable enough for an article of his own? but that's a judgment call and one for discussion, not a given. Hrm. To begin with though, apologies for how I've been conducting myself. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Czech Republic[edit]

Zakládáme WikiProject Czech Republic, možná bys mohl mít zájem, podívej se prosím [1] a hlasuj pro vytvoření. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 10:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Ahoj Michale. Já vím, že np. "Třinec" je "native name", jde spíš o to, že se jedná o dvoujazyčnou obec, a tento fakt je v infoboxu reflektován. Parametr se jmenuje "native_name" a nejde bohužel změnit bez toho aby se rozboural celý infobox. Zdravím a přeji hezký den. - Darwinek 17:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jasně, případ Prahy je učebnicový, ale nenapadá mě jiný způsob jak tuto dvojjazyčnost v infoboxu řešit. Podle mě to vypadá zcela přehledně a normálně pro čtenáře Wikipedie. Na "native_name" narazíš jedině, když dáš článek editovat. Stejným způsobem je vyřešena i problematika měst s výraznou lužicko-srbskou menšinou v Německu. Nevidím v tom žádný problém. - Darwinek 21:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dá se to ještě řešit způsobem, že za český název dáš <br> a název polský. Tím pádem by políčko "native_name" zůstalo prázdné a dané řešení by plnilo svůj účel. - Darwinek 21:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Například zde: Großdubrau. - Darwinek 22:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ahoj. Není to ideální řešení, ale taky to není úplně špatné. - Darwinek 09:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Michal Jurosz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Michal Jurosz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Michal Jurosz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Michal Jurosz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perl Wikipedia Toolkit[edit]

Hi! Is this still available somewhere? I found two URLs around Wikimedia – http://wiki.kn.vutbr.cz/mj/index.cgi?Perl%20Wikipedia%20ToolKit is a dead link, while http://mj41.cz/wiki/Perl_Wikipedia_Toolkit just redirects to your blog, where there are no traces of the toolkit. hu:Wikipédia:Botok is being overhauled and I’m not sure if the link could be replaced, or the whole thing is dead and should be removed. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 15:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi Hi, it is dead for long time. Not maintained and should not be used. I hope there are better tools nowadays. mj41 (talk) 15:07, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mod parrot[edit]

The article Mod parrot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software; no substantial third-party references, development appears to have halted in 2009, parent project was declared dead in 2017

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 02:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mod parrot for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mod parrot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mod parrot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]