Talk:Separations (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

Shouldn't this article be entitled Separations_(album)? --15:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.226.56.230 (talk • contribs)

Requested move 29 April 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Separations → Separations (album) – Yes it should. Separation is the primary topic of Separations. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support for such a common word, it doesn't make sense to make the album the primary topic. Probably a disambigutation page needed. cheers ~~ipuser 90.194.62.161 (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the current title should point to the disambiguation page -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. The singular is the clear primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PLURALPT and WP:TITLECHANGES. This article has been here since 2004 without any issue. Most of the articles at Separation are not used in the plural. As far as I can tell, there is one misplaced link to Separations. There is simply no evidence that the current setup is hurting our readers in any way. As a matter of fact, more people went to Separations this month (1,1714 views) than went to Separation (1,344 views). A vague idea that all plurals should redirect to the singular is counter to WP policy at WP:PLURALPT - there has to be some good evidence-based reason to shift this page, especially since it's been here for 11 years. Dohn joe (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. O N R (talk) 14:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, clear WP:PLURALPT case. bd2412 T 20:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Separations (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110814234751/http://www.firerecords.com/site/index.php?page=artists&artistid=00000000067 to http://www.firerecords.com/site/index.php?page=artists&artistid=00000000067

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]