Talk:Battle of Bazentin Ridge

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Bazentin Ridge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: British / Canadian / European / German / North America / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War I task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Battle of Bazentin Ridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 October 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Battle of Bazentin Ridge marked the start of the second phase of the Battle of the Somme?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/October.

Wikipedia

This article is featured in USA Today.--Eloquence * 12:40, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)

Systemic bias[edit]

The article seems to deal exclusively with the British point of view... isn't there any German source about this battle? --Gengis Gat (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed a few duplicate links with the tool.Keith-264 (talk) 10:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Part of which battle of the Somme?[edit]

As above. Keith-264 (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Real" Subheadings?[edit]

Let's not be dogmatic when there are only a few items under a header. Keith-264 (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They're easier to read and easier to edit. I see no downside to them. DuncanHill (talk) 23:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Easier to read? Keith-264 (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Larger and clearer type. DuncanHill (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

!?! ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]