User talk:Eagleamn

Saudi Arabia[edit]

Hey Eagleamn. I don't understand what you meant by the cinemas thing. But my concern over the demographics section was whether there are sources which say that most westerners live in the eastern province. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks. I have adjusted the cinema statments in the article. Next time please adjust rather than remove. Thanks. Btw, what do you have again Wahabbis? Aren't you native Saudi? --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:28, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well there is some bias against Wahabbis showing but no problem. :) Just wondering though if you are not Sunni Saudi, then what are you? Shi'a Saudi? Christian Saudi? --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:36, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. See you around. a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rashidi[edit]

I see that you have removed part of the quote from William Gifford Palgrave on the Rashidi page, and placed a NPOV on the article. I must confess I´m quite flabbergasted by this. Firstly: I really do not see or understand by which authority you can change/rewrite a quote that comes from a book which was published 140 years ago? You (or I) might agree -or disagree- with mr. Palgrave, but that does not give either of us the right to change his views/writings. A quote is a quote is a quote. Now, you might argue: A: That I have quoted Palgrave wrongly. If that is the case, then point it out to me, and I will of course change the quote so it will be exactly what Palgrave wrote. B: that what Palgrave wrote was wrong. Then you should write that in the Palgrave-article, preferably with references to scolars who support this view (in accordance with PW´s NOR-policy.) C: you could argue that the quote should not be in this article (In which case I will inform you why it was included)

I hope you will inform me about what "factual mistakes that are biased against Shia" the Rashidi article contains. Thank you. Huldra 04:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Btw; just to make myself clear: if you think the quote from Palgrave is insulting and want to take away the whole quote; well, I will not protest too much. My intention with including the quote was to show that there were rulers that had a more inclusive and tolerant view of other groups than the Wahabis did. I took the quote from the Al Rasheed book, but I have just gotten the Palgrave-book itself, so I´m sure I can find another quote which illustrate my point in a manner which is not insulting to any group. I will, however, protest quite strongly on letting the Palgrave-quote stand as it is: it is simply not correct. Now, it looks as if Palgrave wrote this... and he never did (as far as I know). It is simply wrong to let it stand as it is. Regards, Huldra 08:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC) PS: have you read the Palgrave book?[reply]

Hmm, now I see that you just rv you edit before I wrote my last bit, well, as I said: if there is anything you find insulting in the article: please tell me. Regards, Huldra 08:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you very much for your support. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 11:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Strong support. Double thanks to you, my friend. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 10:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your welcome. --Master Bob 06:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the welcome Matt73 14:53, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfD[edit]

What is you Reason for Deletion? The former 134.250.72.176 00:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on using it. I find it easier than typing Wikipedia talk:Counter vandalism unit. Unless you have another suggestion, I would really appreciate keeping it. The former 134.250.72.176 00:12, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The former 134.250.72.176 00:39, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

History of Saudi Arabia[edit]

Yeah, we really need a lot more images on this page. :) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorisation[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Saudi Arabia page as living in or being associated with Saudi Arabia. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Saudi Arabia for instructions. -- Gurch 16:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kingdomcenterfinalstages.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kingdomcenterfinalstages.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Hmm, someone re-uploaded it. Interesting. - Eagle^a^mⁿ 02:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Returnèed"[edit]

That was an accedent. I tried to replace the "e" with a "è" but forgot to remove the old "e", hence the weirdness. Thanx 68.39.174.238 20:23, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New category[edit]

Of possible interest, [[Category:Wikipedians who are pilots]]. Best regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 18:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This type of censorship makes me sick[edit]

YAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!, screw sensorship i was writing a bio on a famous graffiti artitst and i was told by eagleamn that it was vandalism and nonsense to make a site on a graffiti artist?? <--- this will probably be sensored soon enuf anyways ---me---

Vote to keep, show these hypocrites what's what, tolerance? ha, only when it's good for them--Diatrobica;l 23:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

deleting?[edit]

Hi, I'm fairly new. I'm trying to add a buch of Star Trek articles here and I got a message that one of my entries is going to be deleted.

How come?

VfD[edit]

The VfD / AfD templates should be used with subst. That is, put {{subst:vfd}} or {{tl|subst:afd}} (they mean the same thing) at the top of the article, then save and do the other two steps... Jamie 11:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I fixed two of them. After the second I thought you might not be in the practice of using subst. No problem, I make the same mistake too sometimes. I wish I had a macro for AfDs. :) Jamie 11:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Re:Fourteen Bullets[edit]

I have improved on this article by toning down the advertising note and instead adding a link to the interview site. Check it out and tell me if it's better now.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 12:27, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

UT pictures[edit]

I have seen your additions to the UT article, WRT to the pictures. I don't think that the pictures will survive the peer review process because of their copyright status. If you want to keep your images copyright, that's fine, but be aware that another user will probably replace them with pictures that have been released under the GFDL or into the Public Domain. If you have questions about this, please contact me. If someone does not before me, I will remove the images when I get back to campus and take more to replace them. -Scm83x 09:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noted your comments on the talk page and I am wondering if you will release the images under GFDL or PD. Then, they will be more likely to survive the peer review process. -Scm83x 09:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. Rebelguys2 (talk · contribs) is still on campus and may take pictures tomorrow/Tuesday. Thanks. -Scm83x 10:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Riyadh[edit]

Thanks for your concern Eagleamn but I wasn't "experimenting" in the article. The Riyadh article is totally under developed and I will be adding appropriate supplements to the information already there shortly. Shumway 21:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:King_Fahd_Causeway.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:King_Fahd_Causeway.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Please do not use bots without direct supervision! The source was right there. - Eagle^a^mⁿ 03:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary[edit]

Thank you for info. I actually know that, cause I am an admin with more than 26,000 edits. --Darwinek 23:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, don't be sorry for that. Actually I think it may look like, like I feel I am something better, so it's not on my user page. I feel equal with other conscious editors. It is only stated in User:Darwinek/UB, userboxes section. Saw you are from Saudi Arabia, I am interested in Middle East, from time to time adding some geo-stub articles, like recently Bisha or Rafha. Lot of pretty mountains in Saudi Arabia still need articles. - Darwinek 23:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising[edit]

The Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 23:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page[edit]

Yes. That's a very good idea. I saw the talk page too and maybe the best idea is to archive it and then start with a new page. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:09, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi-Iraqi neutral zone[edit]

I'm not familiar with the topic, that's why I asked the question.Loomis51 23:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara[edit]

Hi, here is a vote related to Western Sahara, it's about the neutrality of wikipedia in this conflict, are you interested? Daryou 18:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tag[edit]

You tagged 38a studio as a speedy, but it doesn't fit into the guidelines. Have a look at a lightweight deletion method that is useful for these in-between cases. - brenneman ^{T}^{L} 13:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Messages for IP 198.36.32.17[edit]

Your comments are appreciated. FYI: the IP address in question is an "outside interface" of a/the proxy server at Saudi Aramco, a large company in Saudi Arabia. Therefore edits logged under that IP address may come from any number from dozens to thousands of different users. Cheers 198.36.32.29 16:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC) pl:user:Bmucha[reply]

Sorry, I haven't looked at your user page before posting the above. Obviously you know what Saudi Aramco is! :) Cheers 198.36.32.29 16:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC) pl:user:Bmucha[reply]

Translation request[edit]

Hello, I saw that you are a native speaker of Arabic, so I would like to ask you if you could take a look at 2003 invasion of Iraq and Iraq War. There is a featured article in Arabic which we would like to know how it could be used the English one which is of course dominated by people who have either been there as soldiers or have their knowledge from western media. Someone also asked if the section about "related propaganda and phrases" could be amplified with information about the Iraqi side. Maybe there are also people who took photos in Iraq at the Arabic version? Nameme 15:45, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Looks like the Arabic version can benefit more from the English one than the other way round. I will post your translation to the talk page of one of the articles and point to it at the other one. Nameme 21:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

for your info[edit]

just to let you know that I deleted all you edition to the Iraqi invation articles in arabic because it was biased....have a good life Classic 971 13:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you would like to read both my reply to you in your talk page and the other one in the talk page of Iraq War. - Eagle^a^mⁿ 20:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cleaning topic not clear[edit]

Kindly tell me in nutshell how to improve the artical or else how to delete it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohit11 (talk • contribs)

Personal attacks[edit]

Hi Eagle. What is the dispute about that made him so angry? --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have given him a message about you leaving the Arabic wikipedia. I think that he might stop now on the english one. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jumpers[edit]

I have replied to your request with a reference - the answer is 9, not counting Whitman and his victims. Johntex\^talk 04:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Walker[edit]

Hi, it seems my article was deleted (by another user) before I got the chance to fill it out... I will remove the part about notability as I do not currently possess information to cite this I intend to put the article back up. Thank you. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyraqs (talk • contribs)

re Diopsoidea[edit]

I don't see this as a speedy. It does have info, in the form of the taxobox. Someone interested in Diopsoidea would find on that page the proper classification of it (kingdom, phylum, and on down). I pulled the speedy tag, and usually when I do that I move the article to Prod or AfD, but I didn't do that here, just because I'm tired, although you're welcome to. I do take your point -- there's not actual free text in the article -- so I can see why you did that, I just don't personally agree. Herostratus 08:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeddah[edit]

fine by me ;-) thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.21.177.130 (talk • contribs)

My360[edit]

Please don't restore the prod tag on articles. Prod is for uncontroversial deletions only, and as the notice says, removing the tag is the correct way of objecting to the deletion. Please see WP:PROD#What this process is NOT for. I'm moving it to AfD for you.

Can you please also note in your edit summary that you're prodding an article? It seems kind of important, and if nothing else, it makes it possible to look at the page history to tell if an article has been prodded. NickelShoe 22:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the prod tag because the editor who removed it neither explained nor changed anything in the article. The editor might have blanked the whole article as well including the tag, reverting it will cause the tag to be "restored;" or should it also be removed in that case? Thanks. - Eagle^talk 22:18, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An objection is an objection, regardless of whether the reasoning is explained. Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#Reason for removal and [[Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#Re-{{prod}}ed pages?]] tackle these questions. Consensus seems to be that removing the deletion notice is obviously an objection to the deletion. Blanking the page is almost certainly an endorsement to the deletion, which might even make it speediable as author request in some cases.

The annoying thing is that the counter resets when the tag is removed and restored, so if you get the feeling a person might blank it again, you might send it to AfD just to keep the timer from resetting over and over. NickelShoe 22:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: category[edit]

Yes, I have protected it until everything is resolved. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 06:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a problem because if I'm protecting it I can't do that. I don't think it's a very large dispute so I hope you guys can solve the problem. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 06:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Floyd_Flemmingsworth report on WP:RFI[edit]

After consulting with an admin I've removed that report for now, as the vandalism stopped before your test4/final warning. I've also added the username to the CVU blacklist. Report them to WP:AIV as soon as (if) they start again, where they should get blocked pretty quick. Cheers, Petros471 11:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zerida report on WP:RFI[edit]

It is important to note the line on the protection template that says "(Protection is not an endorsement of the current page version)". Protection is only there to force editors to talk about changes rather than continually revert them. In this case whilst Zerida has removed messages from their talk page, Zerida has given explanations on the category's talk page and you should continue to discuss the issue there. The length of time that a particular edit has stood for, or the 'original' version of a page, does not really matter (as Wikipedia is continually being edited and hopefully improved!). Possibly a Third opinion might be useful here. Petros471 15:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The reason I listed the situation is to have a third opinion (usually it's hard to get one in a category talk page). Since, I suppose, you are familiar with the subject matter now, would you like to give your opinion? Thanks. - Eagletalk 15:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I didn't dive in with my opinion as I was trying to stay neutral. However as you asked and this does seem to be a fairly simple content dispute I will attempt to give my views over on Category talk:Egyptian Americans. Petros471 16:11, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zerida has proposed a compromise over on the category talk page, which sounds reasonable to me. Could you please take a look at it, to see if you agree. If so the page protection can be lifted to allow the relevant changes to be make. Thanks, Petros471 12:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bot welcome[edit]

Well sir, perhaps it is time. ;) JoeBot 19:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My first barnstar! :D Whoohoo! JoeBot 19:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Madeline Gilbert[edit]

I'm quite happy to see this one tagged as db-attack. As I noted in my edit summary, it could also be considered nonsense. The main point is it should be speedied :-) Thanks, Gwernol 20:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SABB[edit]

I see that you made a good choice lol, btw I fixed some redirects again, some got double redirect so it got a bit messy, also did the changes in the main HSBC article.

salam ;) --Muhaidib 08:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:Thanks. I tend to forget to fix the double redirects. I will try to pay more attention next time :) . - Eagle^talk 08:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol no problem, don't mind me askin', are you saudi, or where you just born there. I am saudi but I study in montreal. I am editing the Riyadh city article, want to add a city infobox, if I found a pic somewhere in the net and want to use it, is that cool or someone will bi*** at me ? :P --Muhaidib 08:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Riyadh[edit]

shokran for cleaning up Riyadh's page, I was looking at how to make that photo gallery but I am not that good at the wikicode, etha ma 3ndk man3, 3nde so2al, kam 3mrk ? --Muhaidib 09:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for the warm welcome and the links :) --Najd 09:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Saudi cities[edit]

ahleeen,, keefk,, its me again lol. just wanted to say i made a template:Saudi cities template, what do you think? I am adding it to every saudi city (the ones that exist on wikipedia) around 34

do you know how to add a small saudi flag on the right side of the template box?

mashkooor a5ooy,,,

o by the way,, mashala old enough to drive, you can drive if your 14 lol, o mashalla mn mita fe age to carry a gun :P

ana 18, 19 in april

salaam --Muhaidib 18:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic link[edit]

Hello Eagleamn. I was asked by another editor about the article at this link ar:ويكا اسكندرية. Can you tell me what it's about? Thanks. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be "Alexandrian wicca", whatever that may be... AnonMoos 21:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But is the Arabic article about this too? --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Arabic article seems to be about the same "Alexandrian Wicca" (religion/sorcery/?) that is in the English article. The Arabic article is apparently a translation of the English introduction. - Eagle^talk 00:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I based it on looking at the article -- I couldn't tell much from just the two words you quoted here, since I couldn't find waw-ya-kaf-alif in my Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic at all. My fluency in Arabic is somewhat limited, but based on my perusal of the Arabic article, it's hard to see what else it could be -- the highlighted phrase دين الويكا الوثني "the pagan religion of wee-kah" kind of gives it away... AnonMoos 02:21, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Shams?[edit]

Please tell me in what language "Shams" means "Inhabitant of Greater Syria". Because it sure doesn't seem to mean that in either Arabic or English, according to the sources I have available... AnonMoos 21:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's fine, sorry. I didn't even know that the "Shams" link even existed to "Bilad al-Sham". AnonMoos 02:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the Welcome message! I hope Texas is treating you well; I'm thinking of heading out to Austin during the summer (I'm from Ireland). Anyway, thanks! Hibbleton 21:06, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okk[edit]

ok I got your message about the edit thing, I will :D, but i have a Q about wikipedia message system, how do i replay to a message?! it's really weird this way. anyone can read this message

PS, i saw in your userpage a saudi project? whats that about, I am now trying to add infoboxes and galleries to Saudi cities. I did jedda but didn't find the area info :\ --Muhaidib 01:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wesleyan[edit]

OhioWesleyanCampus.gif is not properly tagged.
- We can alert the person who uploaded it.
The background in Wesleyanseal.jpg does not match the table color; same issue with Bishop.gif.
- Should we change the table color or fix the image?
Beeghly.jpg is not placed correctly.
- What do you mean?
The Presidents of Ohio Wesleyan University table needs some work.
- I agree. How do you think we need to improve it?

Wiki amateur 07:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dubai[edit]

Thanks for your message. I have released to image to PD. AreJay 14:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Hi. I deleted it. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:56, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Prince names instead of mayors[edit]

Hi there. I just thought maybe prince names should be reserved for provinces, on which they are appointed. For cities, it's best to state the mayor's name. I think Riyadh could be an exception (prince of province is also mayor of city?? not sure about this). Another thing, the Eastern Province is governed by Prince Muhammad bin Fahd, not Muhammad bin Abdul Aziz (who died 22 years ago). - Eagle^talk 22:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ohh yeah sorry about that,, I don't think there are mayors for cities,, like alshargya its mohammed bin fahad (my mistake sorry), but to give an idea of who is the ruler of the city, and i don't think there are as many people who look at the provences as much as the cities, PS. you know prince mohammed bin fhad is the richest guy in the world ? :P ,, td5al msn messenger l2ana mn jdd krht al wikipedia message system lol,,, mn jdd la7saaaa!! --Muhaidib 02:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B-52 Units Edit[edit]

From what I understood, there was a 35 kilobyte limit on the B-52 Stratofortress article. There are more angles to the aircraft that will not fit into those constraints (weapons, bomb squadrons, variant specifications, etc.) - what do you recommend? TDRSS 03:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ROG[edit]

ROG is not a hoax, and is signifigant, what proof do you need (no we do not have a website) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DR.J (talk • contribs)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks Danras 04:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Good article[edit]

Template:Good article has been listed for deletion. Please vote to keep this template at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_March_25#Template:Good_article. The {{good article}} template places a small Good Article symbol () in the top right corner of an article to indicate that it is a good article on Wikipedia. —RJN 11:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles marked for deletion[edit]

Thanks for the heads up Eagle. They got flagged in my absence, so it's good you acted. I was just trying to flesh out the Tadawul section with info on the companies listed. Best regards - HiJazzey 14:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Telecom[edit]

Salaam,, I checked out the Saudi Telecom Company article and it was empty, like 2 lines lol. I added an infobox and some info but the thing really needs to be cleaned up/wikified. feel free to check it out when you have time and see what you can do bro

peace --Muhaidib 05:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Saudi Telecom Company[edit]

Thanks alot for the clean-up, it looks great :)

I am not surprised you didn't have it on your watchlist since it had only 2 lines of plain text. Didn't even have the (stub) template!

What do you think of adding the new company Mobily (ar: موبايلي) that just started in 2004-2005, its as you might or might not know a new player in the wireless service network, I wanted to create an article for it but the info is way to limited!

P.S. is the STC a public company or gov. owned? --Muhaidib 07:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Etihad Etisalat/Mobily[edit]

hey there again, Ok I did my best on finding the information on this company. I made redirect links if you click on Etihad Etisalat Company that will take you to the main article Mobily. needs more info I guess, but it's a new company there aren't that many records of it.. peace --Muhaidib 08:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

comment and question[edit]

Hi, could you place {{good article}} at the bottom of the article. I you place them at the top they will cause an annoying blank line at the top in certain situations and hinder editing the introduction of articles a bit. Also I have posted a question at WP:RD/L#Need_some_help_with_a_tranlsation_form_Arabic_to_English which you might be able to answer for me. Cheers, —Ruud 19:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think I will be able make sense of this. —Ruud 20:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

King Abdullah Economic City[edit]

heyy there man,, listen i'll add the logo later trust me,, kl shy fe wagta ya 7lo ;),, for now let me finish all the sections the the article is yourssssss :P

salam :* --Muhaidib 22:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DONE[edit]

5ala9naaaaaaa lol,, finally,, that was hard!

i should get a medal for this hehe :P --Muhaidib 23:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Expansion wikiproject[edit]

salaam,, i'm tryin to do my best at expandin the saudi-related articles,, I am focusing on the big ones first then the small ones

but i'm only one guy and i am thinking about your wikiproject thing,, what is it? i don't know what it means

and by the way i created a header template to expand some saudi related articles,,

to add it to a template just write {{Expand Saudi Arabia}} --Muhaidib 04:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration[edit]

I have referred you to the Arbitration Committee for their consideration over the content dispute we had and the actions you have recently taken. You can find the arbitration request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Eagleamn. If you wish to respond to it, you should respond under the "Statement by party 2" heading. You must keep your response to 500 words or less, or it may be removed without warning by the Committee clerks. — Zerida 07:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The arbitration case was rejected, with the suggestion you try WP:RFC. It would be good to bring in a few more editors to Category talk:Egyptian Americans to allow consensus to be reached. Petros471 11:10, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My (HereToHelp’s) RfA[edit]

Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --Here T oHelp 13:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saudi Arabia[edit]

Hey there, you are invited to join us at the Saudi Arabia WikiProject, which you can help us at and expand Saudi atrticles if you want. Thank you, Salam --Muhaidib 18:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Regarding the article TGV East, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "It is reposted content that was deleted in accordance with the deletion policy (CSD:G4)", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because the content is not the same as what was previously deleted. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:AFD process. Thanks! Stifle 22:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal[edit]

If you thought I was stopping at the Wikiproject, you're wrong lol, Check it out I am creating a Portal:Saudi Arabia see what you can do ;) --muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 18:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okk sure no problem,, take your time --muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info |

) 19:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ahleen[edit]

Hi there, I wanna make this quick cuz gltle enk mash'3oool so0,, anyways baktb 3araby l2ne ma a7b a7d ytlgf lol,, shoof 7ena msween poll 3ala topic ta3baan feh marra,, o ygolon yabon yswoonla delete bs so far 7ena fayzeen fel poll,, it's about the List of Lost episodes, etha walla marra shft al show,, tarah bn klbbb,, show ba6al! anyways bs ba'3eet agoolk etha tgdr td5l al talk page o tswe vote m3ay,, o etha 3ndk tips keef ajeb nas yswoon vote m3ay bdoon ma tzg ma3hom hathol aldaloo3en ;),,, yslmoo bro,, if you can't read this plz tell me okk :P salam ya asad ;) --muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 05:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okk I see your point :),,, someone should make a system for this kindda things, I guess there is but no body is following it lol,, thanks anyways bro,, see ya --muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info |

) 05:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fatwa[edit]

Why did you revert my contribution to fatwa? A scholar that is able to issue a fatwa is called a Mufti in within the Ahlus Sunnah, but an Ayatollah in Shia Islam. Both of them, however, are mujtahids. ScottRR 15:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate a reply to this. ScottRR 20:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I'm aware the word "mujtahid" is used by Muslims to apply to both Sunni and Shia scholars. "Mufti" is usually the title specifically to a Sunni scholar, and "Ayatollah" for a Shia scholar. Thanks for your earlier response. ScottRR 16:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Riyadh[edit]

Hi there, long time no talk :P, may I ask what's disputed about the Riyadh article? Thanks --muhaidib-- (^Talk | _#info | ) 16:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request[edit]

Eagleamn, Can you translate the article Ayyavazhi to Arabic. Please... - Vaikunda Raja 22:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jello shot[edit]

I noticed you claim Gelatin dessert and Tom Lehrer Contradict each other. Please read the talk page before posting things like that. The Talk Page Explains the Disparity and how both statements are true. Please change both articles so they don't appear to contradict each other and remove the tags. Thank you.--E-Bod 00:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Khobarattack.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Khobarattack.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir :)[edit]

small request , i think u r a moderator so i'd ask u to unify these two article because its about the same thing :)

Dar Al-Hekma College Dar Al-hekma

to be one article "Dar Al-Hekma College"

thanx man :) Ammar 20:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Energy portal[edit]

Hi! As a contributor to WikiProject Energy development, I thought you might like to be aware of the opportunity to contribute to the new Energy Portal, now that there is one... No need to reply. Gralo 17:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC02881.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC02881.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 16:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saudi map1.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saudi map1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 16:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Saudimap.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saudimap.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American-bio-stub[edit]

I have nominated the stub redirect you created {{American-bio-stub}} for deletion at WP:SFD. The redirect violates the naming guidelines for stub templates by using the adjective "American" and would cause confusion as to whether or not a stub exists if similar redirects were to be haphazardly created for other US-*-stub templates. Caerwine Caer’s whines 22:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dhahran_gate.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dhahran_gate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy portal & future selected articles[edit]

Hi! Over the past couple of months I've been spending much more time than I should developing the Energy portal, and intend asking for a portal peer review within the next day or so.

The portal provides a showcase for energy-related articles on Wikipedia. One of the most prominent ways is via a the selected article that is currently changed every 6 weeks or so. It would be good to increase this turnover, and with three Wikiprojects dedicated to energy-related topics and a good number of articles already written, I'd like to suggest that members of each Wikiproject might like to use the 'selected article' to feature some of their best work.

With this in mind, I'd like to suggest that your Wikiproject bypasses the normal selected article nomination page and decides collectively which articles are worth featuring - or these may be self-evident from previous discussions - and add short 'introduction' to the selected article at the appropriate place on page Portal:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, which includes further information. Your personal involvement would be welcome!

Please make any comments on your Wikiproject talk page, my talk page, or on Portal talk:Energy/Selected article/Drafts, as appropriate. Gralo 15:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFD for Standards of good articles[edit]

I have suggested that Standards of good articles, a redirect page which you created, be deleted as a cross-namespace redirect. If you would like to comment in the discussion, it is found here. -- Black Falcon 00:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please help improve Plug-in hybrid[edit]

You are listed as a participant in WikiProject Energy development, so I am asking you to please consider helping to improve the plug-in hybrid article. This is an ad hoc article improvement drive. BenB4 08:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Abdullahcity.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abdullahcity.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aramco88.JPG[edit]

Hello, Eagleamn. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Aramco88.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Eagleamn/Aramco-stub. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hanginkuwait.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hanginkuwait.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kfupm.gif[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kfupm.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sabic logo.gif[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sabic logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Western geco.gif[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Western geco.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Saudi Arabia ()[edit]

Inform

Dear member , Please share your images with us in the new Photography department. We really need this co-operation. Thanks for your time. A M M A R 17:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Hydro-seismic.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hydro-seismic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 17:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thecastle videogame.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thecastle videogame.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saudi currency.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Saudi currency.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cryoanesthesia[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Cryoanesthesia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Eagleamn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 972 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Muhammad bin Fahd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Khobarstreetcollapse.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Khobarstreetcollapse.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Khobarstreetcollapse2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Khobarstreetcollapse2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Roadtokhobar.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Roadtokhobar.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Khobarhires.JPG[edit]

Greetings: I wanted to let you know that this image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Khobarhires.JPG) is quite low contrast and a commercial sign is clearly visible in the middle. I suggest that the image will be improved with some basic enhancements and a blur or cut of the commercial sign. Thanks for your consideration, bkengland —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkengland (talk • contribs) 15:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PENGUIN 0000.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PENGUIN 0000.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Khobartowersgroundzero.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Khobartowersgroundzero.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:President Truman with Saud.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:President Truman with Saud.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khobarstreetcollapse.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Khobarstreetcollapse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roadtokhobar.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roadtokhobar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:56, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gate4.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gate4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Abu Hadriyah Street, Saudi Aramco Residential Camp, Dhahran Hills (2004).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:C-130H.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aramco Associated Company for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aramco Associated Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aramco Associated Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Saudi Air Force Hercules C-130[edit]

Hey Eagleamn,

I recently visited RSAF museum in Riyadh.I saw a C-130 over there and it is the same C-130 for which you provided a pic on Wiki.the photo was 10 years old(2003).Can I get some information about when was this plane bought by RSAF and why did it retire so early?

Haseeb1608 (talk) 12:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saudi currency.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saudi currency.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamimi Group[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tamimi Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 07:51, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]