Talk:Syncom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Capabilites of Syncom 1-3?[edit]

There's a bit of disagreement between these two sources:

http://roland.lerc.nasa.gov/~dglover/sat/syncom.html states that several concurrent two-way phone conversations were possible on the Syncom satellites, whilst their NSSDC (1 2 3) entries suggest just one full duplex telephone channel. Any ideas what's right? - Drw25 21:15, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I believe the NSSDC references are correct but flawed. The "Mission" data is unique for each variant but the "Spacecraft and Subsystems" are exactly the same for Syncom 1, 2 and 3 (when in fact the data is specific to Syncom 3). Using Boeing as a source I think the following specifications are correct. In any case I think they are saying though the specs were different both 2 and 3 were only capable of a single two-way conversation.
Syncom 2 had "Two 500-kHz channel, double-conversion repeaters [for] narrowband two-way communication, and a single 5-MHz channel, double-conversion repeater performed one-way wideband communication." i.e. one two-way telephone channel or 16 "teletype" channels.
Syncom 3 had "one 5-MHz [double-conversion repeater] and one switchable (50 kHz or 13 MHz) double-conversion repeater. The increased bandwidth improved television transmissions."Mark83 19:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Heads of State[edit]

Just to make sure there are no arguments about the change on 2009-11-08 in the sentence "In August 1963, President John F. Kennedy in Washington, D.C., telephoned Nigerian Prime Minister Abubakar Balewa aboard USNS Kingsport docked in Lagos Harbor; the first live two-way call between heads of government by satellite" from "heads of state" to "heads of government." (sorry, I was curious, so I had to look it up):

So, both parties were at the time "heads of government" and the new version is correct. Donlammers (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syncom IV (Leasat)[edit]

JediCouncilMemberScooter‎ just corrected some of the date issues here, as Leasat F1 actually launched later than F2 (or at least matched the table with the narrative). However, the dates between the narrative and table still don't all match (some do). This could be due to "launch" vs. "in service" or some such, and I don't understand the ins and outs of these issues in satellite articles, so I am leaving it alone for now, but hoping that someone with more knowledge of the subject can either correct or clarify. To the layman (like me), dates should match unless they are clearly labeled as being for different events. Don Lammers (talk) 13:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Syncom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Syncom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Syncom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]