Talk:Brocken

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brocket Spectre[edit]

I think perhaps it's time to move Brocken Spectre to its own article.... Catherine | talk 22:50, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Crazy politics[edit]

Should the events described here be added to the article?

http://www.thisistrue.com/peak_perfection_5604.html--Tiberius47 02:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocksberg[edit]

The Blocksberg is not everywhere the same mountain. The Blocksberg is the dance floor of the witches in Walpurgis night. In and around the Harz, the Blocksberg is the Brocken but in other regions, other mountains serve the witches. I don't want to say that witches exist, I only explain that "Blocksberg" is not the name of a specific mountain. There are other Blocksbergs like the Hörselberg in Thuringia, the Kandel in the Black Forest and the Staffelberg in Franconia.--Stanzilla (talk) 14:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what a load of rubbish: i live right here in the Harz mountains and can tell you that the BROCKEN, the BLOCKSBERG, and the BOCKSBERG are 3 different mountains in their own right!
The Blocksberg is located in the close vicinity to the Brocken, on the western side of the former 'Iron curtain' (the Brocken was located on the eastern side), while the Bocksberg lies several km to the west in the 'Nordharz' near the town of Hahnenklee. It actually sports a large american radio antenna from the post-war era, and is talked of now in the planning for an adventure park... (by 'waltwide' /13.05.2012) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.20.137.21 (talk) 16:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
According to this article and the German version of the Brocken, the Blocksberg is an alternative name for the Brocken, albeit there are other hills or mountains that bear the name. I can't find a separate Blocksberg in the Harz. The Bocksberg (Harz) is a separate mountain and has its own article - I can find no evidence that this also an alternative name for the Brocken, so intend to delete it from the lede until further information comes to light. --Bermicourt (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move agreed Kotniski (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]



The BrockenBrocken — ...and move Brocken to Brocken (South Georgia). There is no reason for it to be titled "The" Brocken and it contravenes WP:TITLE. Most European mountains are called "the FOO" in English and "FOO" on Wikipedia (Zugspitze, Wetterstein, Matterhorn, etc.), so there is no reason why this mountain should be different. It is easily the primary over the one in the South Georgia which is named after it. Bermicourt (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

What write you for a shit?[edit]

The Brocken is far far far from Oder or Oder valley. At the ground of Brocken is the river Bode, that is the Bode Valley. The Oder is in the near of polish border. The brocken is the highest point of east germany, what was called GDR. I´m from germany!

Whoever you are, you need to check your facts and curb your unnecessary bad language. The Oder referred to here is the river in the Harz - see Oder (Harz) - as opposed to the better known Oder forming part of the German-Polish border. And BTW I think you'll find that the highest mountain in East Germany (GDR) was actually the Fichtelberg (1,215 m), not the Brocken (1,141 m). I'm from England. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Brocken/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Really needs additional references along with inline citations before being considered for C class. RedWolf (talk) 06:12, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 07:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 10:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brocken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brocken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]