User talk:Coburnpharr04/archive4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk to me. I will answer on your talk pages.<<Coburn_Pharr>>

To view my old talk page, click here or here.

Hey Charlie: help me out here: Xavier Romeu. quiero que mas gente la vea para lograr neutrality and add facts —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterRosello (talk • contribs) 19:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus: Puerto Rican Spindalis[edit]

An organized consensus in regard to the Puerto Rican Spindalis has been placed at [1]. Please express your opinion. Tony the Marine

Image Tagging for Image:St_Pius_X.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:St_Pius_X.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WikiProject Puerto Rico Collaboration[edit]

Hi Carlos. I have begun a collaboration of the month for the Puerto Rico Wikiproject. The collaboration is Accentuation. I have created a template and a subpage for it. The template can be found at the top of the project and the details for the collaboration can be accessed through the navigation template or by clicking here. Please tell me what you think about all this. Joelito 22:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


German immigration to Puerto Rico[edit]

Que haces mi Hermano? I wrote a new article German immigration to Puerto Rico and I wanted you to look at it and tell what you think. Nos Vemos, Tony the Marine 14:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Guns N.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Guns N.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 13:02, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Resident Commissioner of PR[edit]

Hi Amigo, how you been? You Know what? You're right! De vez en cuando meto la pata! Hey check out my two latest articles: Flags of Puerto Rico and Puerto Rican migration to New York tell what you think. Tony the Marine 02:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico politicians template[edit]

Could it be possible to create templates for the governor and commisioner resident candidates of the PIP? Joelito 20:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Justice O'Connor and snr. status[edit]

Carlos - just in case you don't have scotus on your watchlist, I must respectfully dissent regarding Justice O'Connor and senior status vs. retirement, for reasons given here. I think your edit would be absolutely right if O'Connor had assumed senior status, but she did not; she retired from the bench, per 28 U.S.C. §371(a). Simon Dodd 15:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PR Project Collaboration of the month[edit]

Hello Coburnpharr04/archive4. It is my intent to begin a Collaboration of the month for the Puerto Rico Wikiproject. I have suggested Politics of Puerto Rico and Economy of Puerto Rico as options for the collaboration for May. Please leave suggestions or comments on the talk page or vote for any of the choices I have suggested. Take care. Joelito 16:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PopePiusXII choir.jpg[edit]

Could you add some source data for this image that you uploaded. The article may be going through a FA nom soon, and I don't want to have to remove the image. savidan(talk) (e@) 19:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the source url. You don't happen to know who the photographer was. Although not technically necessary, that detail may prove helpful. I was unable to find the image in context by following the link you gave me. savidan(talk) (e@) 17:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Puerto Rico budget crisis[edit]

Help yo, 2006 Puerto Rico budget crisis. —Joseph | Talk 07:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need a version in Spanish pronto! Hurry up lazy ass! =P —Joseph | Talk 05:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ole Beich[edit]

The band was founded in 1985 - here's a flyer from their first show on March 26th of that year, bassist Ole Beich included:

He was replaced by Duff McKagan 3 weeks later.

Possibly unfree Image:Hhover.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hhover.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

—Steven G. Johnson 21:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Juramento-gobernador-sm.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Juramento-gobernador-sm.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson 21:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:LuisAFerre.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:LuisAFerre.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson 21:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Iron Stick 800.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Iron Stick 800.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson 21:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Bandpic crue3.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bandpic crue3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Steven G. Johnson 21:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Lmm.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lmm.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Rhc.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhc.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when reverting to old pictures in articles. A lot of pope images have been deleted by the orphan bot. Your revertions simply link to red links now. The new images are there as fillers because the original ones are no longer available. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

No problem. That was the only replacement pic I could find as a holding pic that could be used under fair use. Hopefully we can find a better one. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:PopePaulVI.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PopePaulVI.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court[edit]

Hi, thanks for your comments on my talk page. I think both of your ideas are good ones. We're certainly seeing some early indications of how the Roberts Court will function, and it does not look awfully pretty. You are right that it should be relatively easy to describe the Court's factions with clarity by the end of the current term. Ditto on Justice Kennedy--especially if the trend of him being the man in the middle continues. Anyway, if you want any help with either of these goals, let me know, but I think your ideas are excellent.
Thanks for your comment regarding my bar preperation . . . I'll be ready, I think. You will be there before you know it.
Like you, I have come to admire Breyer in the last couple years--if you have not picked it up yet, Active Liberty is an interesting read. - Jersyko·talk 13:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Popebenedettoencyclical.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 19:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Grito de Lares[edit]

We now have somebody who wishes to change the name of The Grito de Lares to Lares Outcry. Please express your opinion here: Talk:Grito de Lares (The Cry of Lares). Thank you. Tony the Marine 00:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Puerto Ricans[edit]

One of the main concerns about the "list" is that it is getting out of control and that many names of people who have only had their "15 minutes of fame" or simply are non-notables are being added. I propose that we set up guidelines as to who should be admitted with a clear definition as to the terms "notable" and "fame". I am calling upon the parties interested to express their opinion and to help develope these guidelines. I believe that after we take a vote and reach a censensus, said guidelines should be followed and posted either on the article or the articles talk page. We need your help. Tony the Marine 19:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please particpate here: [2]

Hamdan[edit]

Work is being duplicated on Scalia's dissent. Also see Talk:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld#Work_on_the_opinions.--Kchase02 T 03:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the above curt message earlier. I was frantically trying to finish reading the opinion and put in my bit. Anyway, thanks for contributing and welcome to WP:SCOTUS!--Kchase02 T 04:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pius XI.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pius XI.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:PopeBenedict16th.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:PopeBenedict16th.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Megapixie 02:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Acevedo-fortuno.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Acevedo-fortuno.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 08:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Megapixie 02:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico FAC!![edit]

Be sure to support the Puerto Rico FAC!!Hezzy 19:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Learned Hand and Supreme Court[edit]

FYI, please see my response to your question on the talk page of Learned Hand. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned fair use image (Image:Reborn.jpg)[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reborn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 23:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico law as "state law"[edit]

Just a head's up that I have posted to a discussion that you participated in a few months ago at Talk:Supreme_Court_of_Puerto_Rico, so you might want to take a look over there if you don't have that page watchlisted. Regards, Newyorkbrad 22:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico[edit]

I like the new look for the table of Judges you created today in the U.S. District Court article. However, yesterday I checked the judges' names, fixed Judge Cerezo's name, added some middle names and initials that they use regularly, etc. These changes are not reflected in the table which I assume you were working on based on the older version. I wanted to make sure that there was not some substantive reason you disagreed with my changes to the names. If there is, let me know; if not, let me know whether I should go ahead and fix the names or whether you'd prefer to do it. Regards, Newyorkbrad 18:23, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'll fix up the names again, though I may not be able to get to it for a couple of days. As I said, the chart looks good. Regards, Newyorkbrad 00:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the names of the former District Judges need accent marks added. They are often omitted in English, but since we have them for the current judges, all the names should be properly accented for the sake of consistency and accuracy. I can try to figure out where the marks belong, but perhaps you or someone else would be more accurate. Newyorkbrad 21:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought an accent was needed on the "a" in "Fernandez-Badillo" and the last "i" in "Gierbolini-Ortiz"? Newyorkbrad 12:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image on {{Politics of Puerto Rico}}[edit]

Twice now you have re-inserted Image:CoatofarmsPR.jpg into {{Politics of Puerto Rico}}. The image is tagged with a fair use tag. Per terms of Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9, the use of fair use images in templates is proscribed. Please do not re-insert the image back into the template. If you have any questions about this I'd be happy to answer. Thank you, --Durin 16:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • And yet again you reinsert the image [3]. Final warning; If you reinsert the image again, I will temporarily block you for failure to observe Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9 policy. I'd be happy to help explain this in further detail with you but insisting on replacing the image in violation of policy is not the way to go about doing this. --Durin 22:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logotribunal.gif)[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Logotribunal.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Durin 16:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images with no source[edit]

These images do not specify their source (for example, the website they were taken from) and therefore will be deleted in 7 days:


Fair use rationale for Image:Juanpablouno.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Juanpablouno.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thatcher131 14:15, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Que oasa mi hermano?[edit]

Long time I haven't talked to you. I invite you to take a look at my article "Puerto Rican women in the military". I wanted to do something to honor our women. Cuidate. Tony the Marine 06:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Justice Samuel Alito.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Justice Samuel Alito.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a free image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tomf688 (talk - email) 00:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stryperpress.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stryperpress.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 19:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bishopgonzaleznieves.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bishopgonzaleznieves.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Translation[edit]

Hello! A while ago you signed up to help translate articles from other Wikipedias at Wikipedia:Translators available.

This page has since become obsolete and has been replaced by two userbox templates.

If you are still interested in translating, you may sign up again by using one of the following userboxes on your userpage (while changing, of course, the codes according to the languages you speak): 

   {{Translator|es|Spanish}} 
   {{Proofreader|fr|French}}

We hope to see you soon on Wikipedia:Translation!

Christian Metal Project[edit]

If you are interested in joining a potential Project Wiki Christian Metal project go here to sign up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Christian_Metal --E tac 07:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year
[edit]

(Feliz Año Nuevo)


Happy New Year from Tony the Marine 02:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world this coming year.

Unspecified source for Image:SCOTUS_1971-1975.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SCOTUS_1971-1975.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:SCOTUS_2006(2).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:SCOTUS_2006(2).jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jgarfield.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jgarfield.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 03:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:2v0n5vp.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2v0n5vp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Warren e burger photo.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Warren e burger photo.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes[edit]

Check out the Userboxes: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Puerto Rico, Tony the Marine 20:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ouellet.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ouellet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pesquera.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pesquera.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:2v0n5vp.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:2v0n5vp.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Panser Born- (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Puerto Rico[edit]

Hey! The Puerto Rico Portal page has been revamped with additional content, including a Selected series of Articles, Pictures, and Biographies related to Puerto Rico. However, maintaining a Portal is no easy task. As a member of the WikiProject Puerto Rico, please consider helping out in one of the following tasks:

  • You can add Puerto Rico current events and news to the In the news... section as they occur.
  • You can participate in the discussion of Nominations for content nominated to Selected status.
  • You can nominate content for Selected status in the Nominations page.

Your help and contributions are greatly appreciated. Enjoy the Portal! - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 03:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message for all WikiProject Puerto Rico participants.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cantstoptherock.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cantstoptherock.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Supremeofpr.jpg[edit]

WRT your comment, yes PR is part of the US, but ONLY things from the Federal government itself (and none other — we've found out that none of the states PD things) are public domain. This one probably isn't. 68.39.174.238 02:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rebornstryper.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rebornstryper.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Livealbumstryper.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Livealbumstryper.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sevenstryper.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sevenstryper.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Soldiersundercommand.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Soldiersundercommand.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Album-thwtd.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Album-thwtd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Puerto Rico June 2007 Newsletter[edit]

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter
Year I - Issue 1 - June 2007

Hello, Coburnpharr04. This is the WikiProject Puerto Rico Monthly Newsletter for June 2007. Enjoy!

News
  • The first issue of the Wikiproject Puerto Rico Newsletter was delivered! Please help with the newsletter by suggesting content to be included on the newsletter by leaving a message on Boricuaeddie's talk page.
  • Special thanks to R Delivery Bot and its operator, R, for delivering this newsletter.
  • Eljohnson15 joined the project on June 22. Welcome!
  • Portal:Puerto Rico was revamped with additional content, including Selected series of Articles, Pictures, and Biographies related to Puerto Rico. Please help maintain the Portal. Thank you, Mtmelendez, for all of your help with the Portal!
  • History of Puerto Rico, one of our Featured articles, was displayed at the Main Page on June 18. Thanks to all of the users who helped by reviewing and improving the article and reverting vandalism done to the article during its display. Special thanks to Joelito for all of his work on the article.
  • Special thanks to Mtmelendez for keeping us updated on all things related to the project.
  • See or edit the current tasklist here.
Users who helped with this newsletter:
Useful links:


You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Puerto Rico. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, please contact User talk:Boricuaeddie. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 18:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Article Assessment for WikiProject Puerto Rico[edit]

Hello, Coburnpharr04! As you may know already, WikiProject Puerto Rico, in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, is trying to assess the quality of articles within our scope to help us focus our work on the articles who need it the most. Unfortunately, there is a backlog of more than 799 unassessed articles within our scope. I, in the name of the members of WikiProject Puerto Rico, ask you, if you have the time, to help your fellow members clean up the backlog by assessing unassessed articles and review articles already assessed to make sure they still meet the quality criteria. You can learn more about the WikiProject's article assessment program at Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment.

I, personally, found assessing articles manually took too much time, so I looked around and found a script that makes assessing articles easier. If you would like the script's help, just copy the following code to your monobook.js. 

 // [[User:Outriggr/metadatatest.js]]      
 importScript('User:Outriggr/metadatatest.js'); 
 assessmentMyTemplateCode = ["{{PuertoRicoproj|class=|importance=}}"];

You can find the manual for the script at User talk:Outriggr/metadatatest.js. If you need help, please contact me. Thank you for your time. I hope you can find the time to help. This message has been automatically delivered to all WikiProject Puerto Rico participants using AWB. Happy editing! Yours sincerely, Eddie 17:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Munoz kennedy.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Munoz kennedy.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Yellowandblack.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yellowandblack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:04, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arroyo_355_040815.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Arroyo_355_040815.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Munoz kennedy.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Munoz kennedy.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Munozmar.gif)[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Munozmar.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Agüeybaná 22:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pius XI.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pius XI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 03:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Supremeofpr.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Supremeofpr.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 23:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questioning minor 1st paragraph edits?[edit]

Re: John Roberts, John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sandra Day O'Connor
This is a small matter. I don't understand the reasons for Sjrplscjnky's recent minor edits of articles about each of the Justices of the Supreme Court. After some time, there has been no response to inquiries posted on this editor's talk page nor has there been feedback from similar postings on the talk pages of each of the nine articles about a sitting Justice and the one about retired Justice O'Connor. Rather than simply reverting this "improvement," I thought it best to solicit comment from others who might be interested. I found your name amongst others at Talk:Supreme Court of the United States.

I'm persuaded that Sjrplscjnky's strategy of introducing academic honors in the first paragraph is unhelpful in this narrow set of articles -- that is, in Wikipedia articles about Justices of the Supreme Court. I think my reasoning might well extend as well to others on the Federal bench. In each instance, I would question adding this information only in the first paragraph -- not elsewhere in the article.

In support of my view that this edit should be reverted, please consider re-visiting articles written about the following pairs of jurists.

The question becomes: Would the current version of the Wikipedia article about any one of them -- or either pair -- be improved by academic credentials in the introductory paragraph? I think not.

Perhaps it helps to repeat a wry argument Kathleen Sullivan of Stanford Law makes when she suggests that some on the Harvard Law faculty do wonder how Antonin Scalia avoided learning what others have managed to grasp about the processes of judging? I would hope this anecdote gently illustrates the point.

Less humorous, but an even stronger argument is the one Clarence Thomas makes when he mentions wanting to return his law degree to Yale.

As you can see, I'm questioning relatively trivial edit; but I hope you agree that this otherwise plausible "improvement" should be removed from introductory paragraphs of ten articles. If not, why not?

Would you care to offer a comment or observation? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ingodwetrustsmall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ingodwetrustsmall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Munoz-stamp.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Munoz-stamp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PopePiusXII choir.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PopePiusXII choir.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:President-allen.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:President-allen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Juanpablouno.jpg)[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Juanpablouno.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Relata refero (disp.) 11:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives[edit]

Please note that to create talk archives, you should use a forward slash "/", so as to create a subpage. I've fixed this with your user talk archive (hope you don't mind): recently a lot of these pages have been deleted. Regards, --RFBailey (talk) 03:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter[edit]

The WikiProject Puerto Rico Newsletter
Year II - Issue 1 - Summer 2008

"Confía en tu propia voluntad más que en hombre alguno sobre la tierra. Esa es tu fuerza, no soy yo tu fuerza. Tú mismo eres tu fuerza!" - Luis Muñoz Marín

From the editor

Hello, Coburnpharr04. This is the fifth issue of WikiProject Puerto Rico's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members to keep up with the latest news relating to the project. I will continue Eddie's format and willingness to include new material by request. As he once said, please help with the newsletter by suggesting content to be included on the newsletter by leaving a message on my talk page. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Se levanta un gigante dormido

Saludos to all, I present to you the new version of our project's Newsletter. It has been almost a year since the last edition, but rest assured that we haven't been lazy. Our Good Article count has raised by 11, while we have produced two Featured Lists and two Featured Articles. I will tweak the delivery format, from now on the Newsletter will be delivered per season. That means four anual editions, one for summer, fall, winter and spring. Speaking of summer, it has been a hot one, make sure to check out the project news below. I will also introduce a new section titled "Puerto Rican Highlight" where we will comment about positive accomplishments reached by Puerto Ricans and our representative organizations. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Users who helped with this newsletter
Other areas where you can help
An image for you!


Majestic isn't it? That's the Arecibo Observatory, it has the largest single-aperture telescope ever built.
Majestic isn't it? That's the Arecibo Observatory, it has the largest single-aperture telescope ever built.
Project News
Puerto Rican Highlight
On August 3, Tarah Gieger became the first athlete from Puerto Rico to win a gold medal at the Summer X Games. (ESPN Deportes) In 2007, Gieger also became the first woman to participate at a Motocross des Nations, being part of Team Puerto Rico.

Addbot (talk) 06:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Paul sextus.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul sextus.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC[edit]

Please respond to the RFC on Clarence Thomas. Wallamoose and other partisan editors are trying to decimate the section on Anita Hill and the other women who accused Thomas of sexual misconduct. RafaelRGarcia (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tucker Baynes[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tucker Baynes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails any notability. Minor character, no real world information, no references.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 08:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tucker Baynes[edit]

I have nominated Tucker Baynes, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker Baynes. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logotspr.gif)[edit]

You've uploaded File:Logotspr.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Banderas[edit]

Hello Coburnpharr04, in light of recent discoveries, I am proposing a consensus concerning the colors of the flag of Puerto Rico in neutral articles. Please see the project's talk page for further detail. Thanks for your time. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new law-related task force for the J.D. curriculum[edit]

Hi Coburnpharr04/archive4,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Agradman talk/contribs 01:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject TRANSWIKI[edit]

You are invited to join WikiProject TRANSWIKI and join the sub language project of your choice. The aim is to draw up a full directory of missing articles from other wikipedias by language and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coburnpharr04/archive4&oldid=1143388976"