User talk:Davelane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi ppl, I will shortly be creating a list of pages im making changes to and why

  • Mirrors and forks I've done some tidying here -- mostly seems to have been working well. Theres more to do -- this is on hold to see what other people think about my whole attitude -- I think it would be wrong for me to get too involved in this yet.


Sussex / Surrey south downs etc -- this is my current toy

See my main page for this

A roads motorways need to work out what needs doing


Old Stuff[edit]

Hi Davelane, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few helpful links to start you off: Avoiding common mistakes, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style, Policies and guidelines, Help, Merging pages.

If you need help or are curious about something, feel free to ask on my talk page or the village pump. You can sign your name and a date stamp on comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian!

Andre 22:48, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)



Hi. I'm in Lewes. Where are you? Mintguy (T) 09:35, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Mirrors and forks[edit]

I've responded on the talk page, here. Thanks! JesseW 09:47, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Good work on Mirrors and Forks[edit]

I like what you've done with Mirrors and Forks, esspecially the colors on the GFDL compliance page. Good work. JesseW 02:29, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sussex to do list[edit]

Hi, I agree with you that categories are better than making lists mannually, but we use lists when not all the articles have been created yet, which is the case for most of the counties in the UK (I think Dorset is the only county with a page on every town and parish). Also, I think all of the Towns categories should already be complete, as I think every town on the List of settlements with a town charter (I forget the exact location of the article) has an article on them. Joe D (t) 19:46, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Just curious why it was necessary. Is there something to fill in Six Degrees of Separation? I guess the root at why I'm asking is the pages (small) number of pages pointing to Six Degrees of Separation looking for the film.... Cburnett 04:39, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hope to see you back...[edit]

You haven't edited since May, so I'm just checking to see if you're still here. Hope it's just a temporary WikiBreak; I can really use your help on Wikipedia:Mirrors and Forks.... ;-) JesseW 22:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I did a major edit to organise the article into proper sections to give people scope for including material and also to make it NPOV. It needs more precise detail and hard facts but I've done what I can. Most new information should slot in fairly well. You were looking at it before and it's been sitting there untinkered with for a while so I figured I'd bring it to your attention for tinkering purposes Bandraoi 21:52, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


WikiBreak[edit]

Yeah Ive been away for a while - I hope to get back into things soon

I particually want to rewrite crimewatch --~~

Hi - I've deleted your REDIRECT on this - see the talk page for explanation Peter Shearan 15:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings[edit]

Just thought I'd say "hi" to a fellow Briton!

EvocativeIntrigue 21:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


User:Davelane/jabber_rw

The Fureys[edit]

The article The Fureys has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 16:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


im back[edit]

finally remembered my password after 5 years and have set an email address in case it happens again (which is a new option btw) Davelane (talk) 23:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]