Talk:Fraction (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

(Most of the "fraction" page has now moved to fraction (mathematics). Consequently, much of the talk below refers to that page, and should be continued there if it concerns issues that are no more detailed here.)

Expansion and disambiguation[edit]

This latest expansion of the article goes just a little too far in places. Some of the information - e.g. on lowest common denominator - should be on the rational fraction page, not here. Why? Because this is a disambiguation page. Paul Beardsell 13:42, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Why is this a disambiguation page? I came here by numerator and denominator and was rather disappointed by what I found. It does not deal with obvious fractions such as 0.33333333... or many of the points raised in Whatlinkshere target=Fraction, and cannot unless it turns into a more complete article. 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

As the disambiguation message says: Go back and fix the links! Go to numerator and denominator and point to vulgar fraction or to rational number. It doesn't have to be a disambiguation page. But it was one before you added your extra info (much of it useful and retained). But disambiguation is needed! But the stuff I culled is not suitable for a disambiguation page: Its proper home is in the pages linked to from the disambiguation page. The 20 month old rational fraction page is merely a recipe book for performing arithmetic on fractions. I reckon it should be moved to vulgar fraction arithmetic. What do you think? The current situation is not ideal. I am trying to improve it. Unfortunately it has to be done incrementally. Paul Beardsell 14:41, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I have an idea: Take all the vulgar fraction stuff off to a new vulgar fraction page. Left here will be disambiguation between common usage of fraction, a link to vulgar fraction with all the sub-categories quickly named but not explained. Also left here would be a link to partial fractions. Numerator and denominaor can then reference vulgar fraction. Paul Beardsell 14:47, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I felt it was really time to really disambiguate: As there are even meanings of "fraction" that do not concern mathematics at all, it is no longer justified to leave them at the end of 20 special cases of rational numbers. I tried, however, to leave several "direct" links to the main meanings of fractions in mathematics. I hope you agree. MFH 18:11, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Irrational Fraction[edit]

see Talk:fraction (mathematics)#Irrational Fraction Done Paradoctor (talk) 03:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Markup[edit]

According to the style guide we are supposed to avoid HTML such as ”. I removed the paragraph markup from the article. Paul Beardsell 21:36, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Disambiguation[edit]

I may be biased, but it seems to me that fraction (mathematics) is much more common than the other interpretations. Shouldn't, then, the fraction (mathematics) article be moved here, and this page moved to fraction (disambiguation)? -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The advantage of having the dab page here is that it's clear which articles | linking to here are linked incorrectly - all of them. With an actual article here, there's no way of knowing what shouldn't be linking here. Josh Parris#: 04:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"linked incorrectly" One article, three redirects, that can easily be fixed where appropriate.

"no way of knowing what shouldn't be linking here" A WP:HATNOTE linking to the disambiguation page fixes that. Paradoctor (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, shouldn't this page should really be about mathematical fractions? Maybe it would be best to switch it back after cleaning up bad incoming links (if this hasn't already been done). —Ben Kovitz (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support According to traffic stats, fraction (mathematics) has almost twice the traffic (~140k last 90 days) of the other articles combined (~80k), the lion's share (50k+) of which goes to timeshare via "fractional". Paradoctor (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fraction in Physics[edit]

what about fraction in physics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by محبوب عالم (talk • contribs) 19:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that covered by fraction (chemistry)?

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fraction (mathematics) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]