User talk:Lcgarcia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

[[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 18:57, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Your question[edit]

Usually, that's just a problem with your computer not updating (it has to clear its cache). If you're using Internet Explorer, try pressing Cntrl+F5 a few times (not sure what the refresh command is in other browsers). If the problem continues, then ask at the Wikipedia:Help desk. Rest assured, the article has not been lost. Best wishes, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 22:10, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Your subsequent question[edit]

As for the vertical bar, that's called piping. Essentially, it makes a look appear to be whatever is after the pipe, yet clicking on the link will take you to what's before the pipe. For example, this [[United States|American]] will look like this: American. As for the Special:Newpages question, I'm afraid I don't know. I'd check the help desk, if I were you. Best, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:52, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)

From Colombia[edit]

Hello. I've just found your page, and seen that you're living in Colombia. You might want to add yourself to this list. --Fibonacci 3 July 2005 08:18 (UTC)

WikiProyecto y Wikiportal[edit]

Bien ya podemos ver los wikiproyecto y wikiportal de Colombia en esta wiki:

Estos portales y proyectos están también en la wikipedia en español (pueden seguir los interwikis).

— Carlos Th (talk) 11:48, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

list of portable applications[edit]

Hi, I've replied on the article talk page. Thanks for your contribution. Hasta luego! :) Gflores Talk 00:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consulta: Wikimedia Colombia[edit]

Hola, Lcgarcia:

Desde hace un tiempo he venido cabilando con la idea de fundar un capítulo Colombiano de la Wikimedia Foundation, y para esto necesito de los comentarios y de la ayuda de los posibles interesados.

La idea del capítulo es formar una organización sin ánimo de lucro dentro de la legislación colombiana. Muy probablemente una Fundación sea el tipo de entidad más acorde a los objetivos planteados.

La invitación es para inscribir su nombre en la página de la propuesta sin ningún compromiso. También recibo comenentarios allá o en mi página de discusión sobre cualquier inquietud que tenga lugar.

En la página de la propuesta también se podrá encontrar un borrador de los posibles estatutos de la Fundación, los objetivos planteados, etc. y está abierta a cualquier tipo de contribuciones e inquietudes. Las ideas incluyen desde la canalización de fondos para la Wikimedia Foundation (los found raisings) hasta varios proyectos de promoción del conocimiento libre en Colombia (tanto por medio de los proyectos de Wikimedia, como por otros proyectos basados o no en tecnologías Wiki). Sin duda un objetivo interesante será la promoción de las lenguas indígenas colombianas con el objetivo adicional de empoderar a las culturas que las hablan de herramientas informáticas que no sean percibidas como alienantes.

Si conoce de algún otro colombiano que pueda estar interesado, no sólo wikipedistas o colaboradores de Wikimedia, agradezco la difución de este mensaje.

Gracias por la atención.
— Carlos Th (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bien. Sin duda será muy valiosa su colaboración en sacar adelante el proyecto. Una percepción que he tenido sobre los grupos indígenas en Colombia es el rechazo a las tecnologías informáticas. Esto, junto con el bajo acceso que existe en el país, no sólo para las minorías étnicas, y, como usted menciona, el bajo nivel de ocio dentro de las comunidades nesesario para sacar adelante un proyecto como este, sin duda son obstáculos grandes que debemos superar.
El que sea difícil no quiere decir que nos desanimemos de antemano. Una Wikipedia en un idioma propio me parece una muy buena opción para acercar la tecnología a la comunidad. La penetración tecnológica y el tiempo serán elementos que las mismas comunidades puedan exigir para sí cuando participen en algo en lo cual creen. Páseme un vínculo a su wiki y veremos qué se puede hacer.
— Carlos Th (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your question[edit]

hola Lcgarcia, thank you for your message and thank you for fighting vandalism. Yes, I think you did well to revert those edits on Leopold II of Belgium. What you normally do, you just revert the edits by a vandal by going back to the last unvandalised version. In the edit summary below, it's best to explain what exactly you have done in order for everyone to see you reversed a vandalism rightly. Normally this is written like "rv vandalism by User:....... to last version by User:.....". Best also to contact that vandal and slap a warning on the talk page (not the user page). If you need help which template and warning needs to be used for a first-vandal, you can take a look here Template:TestTemplates, which should help you see which warning goes best. if you have further questions, feel free to ask and good luck. thanks again for fighting vandalism. Gryffindor 17:15, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Qué más compatriota?[edit]

Hola Caleiva le escribo para pedirle que me ayude a pulir unos artículos relacionados con Cúcuta que traduje mediante Google de la Wikipedia en Español.

Ayudame con lo que puedas...

Los artículos en cuestión son los siguientes:

Muchas gracias!

--Ricardoramirezj 13:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ECO[edit]

It was removed because I requested it to be removed. It has now been deleted and replaced with a stub without any copywright issues. Saludos The Bald One White cat 18:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zafira (actress)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zafira (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 15:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trade and Environment Database-TED[edit]

A tag has been placed on Trade and Environment Database-TED requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trade and Environment Database-TED[edit]

The article Trade and Environment Database-TED has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trade and Environment Database-TED[edit]

Trade and Environment Database-TED was deemed non-notable by myself and the editor who deleted it. You can ask for a deletion review. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ipomoea carnea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Se (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Deutsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RECLUS[edit]

The article RECLUS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PaintedCarpet (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion notice was removed. Please see comment here Lcgarcia (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IATEUR, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Environment and Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albedo[edit]

I apologize for the revert mistake. Your change has been restored. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Illuminati (Roman)[edit]

Hello Lcgarcia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Illuminati (Roman) for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Illuminati (Roman Academy)[edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Illuminati (Roman Academy) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illuminati (Roman Academy) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lcgarcia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Covariance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lcgarcia&oldid=1080794075"