Talk:Seraphim proudleduck

from VfD:

The first spammers-gaming-Google competition, Nigritude ultramarine, was just barely notable; this later one isn't particularly notable at all, and has started attracting linkspammers. tregoweth 17:31, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)

Keep. Informative. Mikkalai 22:05, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to google bomb. — Gwalla | Talk 03:00, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Not sure that this article is notable, but I'd suggest a speedy removal of the phrase 'Seraphim proudleduck' whenever it appears anywhere on Wikipedia from now until January. Although the money would help buy Wikipedia a new server... Average Earthman 11:04, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. It is informative and it's very hard to find real information about this stupidity. Manni 14:30, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Spank all the people who never have voted delete on a single VfD --Improv 14:45, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect--Tomheaton 19:22, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• I don't know if I can vote for this, but what about create a new page "SEO Contest" or "SEO Challenge" that will give a better place to describe this and the nigritude ultramarine contest. I don't see this contest as a Google Bomb at all, to me getting a page listed for an unrelated term without participation of the site owners is a Google Bomb (such as litigious bastards = SCO, or miserable failure = Bush). This article is well written and informative, it just happens to be on an extrememly stupid contest. Ignoring this stupid contest isn't going to make it go away, might as well let people know about it and the problems it causes. -- JoeChongq 21:51, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• This should definately be merge/redirected somewhere. I guess google bomb is the best place. —siroχo 22:08, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to google bomb or rename per JoeChongq's recommendation. Geogre 13:41, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Nigritude Ultramarine, or better yet move both to a new title SEO Competitions. (Note that if you were going to move, merge or redirect to start with, you needn't list pages here. Be Bold!) Kim Bruning 13:02, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. - SimonP 06:35, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

• Keep. In my opinion, this article should stay where it is. As Manni said, it's very hard to find accurate information on this contest. I've put a lot of time into investigating the contest and writing and organizing this article. If it absolutely can not stay where it is, it should be combined with the nigritude ultramarine article into a new article called SEO contests or something like that, and not combined with google bomb. But I still recommend that this article stays where it is now. --Taestell 20:57, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Not sure that the statement "Seraphim is a class of angels in Jewish and Christian mythology" is correct

Although the bible does not use the term "seraphim" it does use the word "seraph", from which the term "seraphim" has probably been derived. Therefore, to call refer to it as mythology would be incorrect.