Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 ft 3 in

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 20:25, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

6 ft 3 in[edit]

This article is un-encyclopedic, and I see no point in keeping it. Dr Gangrene 20:25, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • Perhaps the "point" will be clearer when I get the rest of the Height Series pages up. Until then, try to calm down.

Getalis 20:28, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/6'4". Andrewa 20:46, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, if it can be made into a sizable list. I'm sure someone would want to know what tall people there were. Riffsyphon1024 21:08, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Topic's totally irrelevant --Neigel von Teighen 21:10, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Given that I voted Delete for 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m), I'll let you guess what I vote on this --RoySmith 21:54, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, as per 6'4", but more so. sjorford:// 22:07, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/6'4". RickK 22:24, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, just like 6' 4" (and why isn't the naming system for this series even consistent?) -R. fiend 22:36, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Pointless. --LeeHunter 23:16, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Mikkalai 23:17, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pointless. Mandel 23:21, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Please don't put up any more of your "Height Series" articles. Write an article about human height instead, if something similar doesn't already exist. I am sure encyclopedic things can be said on that subject. But one article for each half-inch of height is stupid. What's next? How about various penis lengths? Seems to be a lot of interest in that, judging from the email I've been getting. --BM 00:02, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • KeepJust interesting to have lying around. bakuzjw (aka 578) 00:08, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • A list of extremely tall and extremely short people would be interesting, but this is pointless. Delete the whole series. Tuf-Kat 01:09, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • (No vote) What if all of these things were in one article? Kappa
  • Delete, see my previous comments on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/6'4". Megan1967 03:17, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and take the whole series with it. -- Hoary 04:13, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)
  • Delete and concur with Hoary. Ambi 07:22, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Completely harmless. If you aren't interested, just ignroe itPhilip 10:31, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all. —Korath (Talk) 09:04, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - merge relevant into to articles about the people concerned - Skysmith 09:47, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Another pointless height article. ral315 21:42, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

See also[edit]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/6_ft_3_in&oldid=49782425"