Talk:The Dish

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.

Australia: New South Wales / Cinema Low‑importance

	Australia portal The Dish is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled[edit]

The Dish in the Stanford Foothills is currently in use as far as I know (although it wasn't for some time). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jholman (talk • contribs)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Dish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020329052944/http://afc.gov.au/GTP/mrboxausttop5.html to http://www.afc.gov.au/GTP/mrboxausttop5.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Used a full moon to retrieve the signal"?[edit]

Under the heading "Historical accuracy", the final sentence states "Also the Moon was not full in the preceding two weeks prior the moon landing, while in the movie they used a full moon to retrieve the signal." (emphasis added) No source is provided for this. Can anyone explain what "using a full moon to retrieve a signal" is? It's my understanding that the phases of the moon are strictly a matter of the moon and earth's positions relative to the sun, so I don't understand how a full (or new) moon would affect the reception of a radio signal. And I suspect "receive" would be a better term than "retrieve" for a signal, since "retrieve" implies that someone travels to somewhere else to get something; hardly the case with a radio signal. Bricology (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bricology: It's a while since I watched this. I think they "retrieved the signal" by realising that the spacecraft would be offset from the moon by an angle and direction they could easily calculate, so they pointed the dish at the moon, applied the offset, and started to hear from the spacecraft again. I don't recall the phase of the moon that was shown; if it was full, then that would indeed have been an error. My recollection is certainly not a reliable source! -- John of Reading (talk) 07:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]