User talk:Thomas Ruefner

Thanks for all your cleanup on Phèdre --Arcadian 04:06, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

re: Lucien Goldmann

Hey, thanks for contributing to the article. I am certainly no expert, and only have experience with Le dieu caché, not anything else. so if you think of anything, just throw it on there...

re: uomo universale

hello thomas, thanks for writing to me. sorry, i did not read the talk page before editing U.U. my beef with the previous content was that it pretty much just repeated information also given on the polymath page. i am totally receptive to the concepts being differentiated - this just wasn't how i read the previous iteration. it sounds to me like you do in fact know the difference, so please add a sentence or two explaining it! best, Aaronbrick 18:34, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

re: dab Altdorf

Hi, would know for sure which one the four links on Special:Whatlinkshere/Altdorf should point to? I suppose it's at least twice Weingarten. -- User:Docu

Re: Fritz Schulz stub class?

• Hi. First thanks for your notification. I agree with you that the article is a little more than "very little meaningful content" but it need a few more improvments for start class. I use this too. For a Start class an article should "provide enough sources to establish verifiability" and there is not any sources in the article. If you or any other person can add some sources then it would be an start class article. Thanks again and soory for my not well english. Solar-Poseidon 22:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

• If it is a biographical paper the it is enough for Start class. But the current section title (Literature) should change to References. This title can make people to misunderstand it. Personally I thought it is one of his works. I think you can reassess the article if you want (or leave a message for me to this). Thanks again. Solar-Poseidon 23:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thomas Ruefner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)