Talk:Acts of Peter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

anti-Catholic diatribe[edit]

I have replaced the drivel anti-Catholic diatribe that was added as the new article with info found on a respectable site quoting the Anchor Bible Dictionary (not sure of the copyright implications) Kuratowski's Ghost 22:26, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Could someone correct this phrase?[edit]

Could someone correct this phrase? "during the second half of the 2d century". Does this mean the 2nd century? (03/04/2007)

..."during the second half of the 2d century" means between 150-200 AD. DiverDave (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get some citations[edit]

Can we get some citations, especially those in regards to dating the manuscript.96.32.183.205 (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided an inline citation for this. DiverDave (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quo vadis[edit]

If the source, of at least most common usage of the phrase Quo vadis is from the Acts of Peter, this should be mentioned in the article. 78.69.107.39 (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apocryphal[edit]

there is no such thing as an apocryphal gospel. wouldn't heretic or heterodox,or non canonical be a better term? 67.176.160.47 (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term "apocryphal gospel" simply refers to all of the gospels which have been deemed by widespread consensus to be non-canonical. DiverDave (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No cannonical text mentions Peter's death?[edit]

"No canonical text refers to the death of Saint Peter"

This is false. John 21:19 states:

Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God. Then he said to him, “Follow me!”

So in fact, Peter's death is mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:8D13:D700:F552:B378:3B4D:A5CC (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]