Talk:Francis Seow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Even though I think it is not neutral, far worse is that fact that it is a poorly written entry. Victortan 15:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keeps asserting a certain dialogue with little elaboration, not neutral. Even though I detest the PAP myself, the way the article presents the facts would turn any reader off.

i think without any sources and references it is problematic Chensiyuan 23:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated content[edit]

I suggest that we remove the section Alleged influence on America and perhaps move it to another article(perhaps the developmental state)? Aside of this, I think it does not quote any sources and therefore is highly suspect. --Ghormax 13:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since when is Francis Yeow OXBRIDGE and HARVARD educated?? I doubt he did his degrees in Oxford and Cambridge.

I agree that "Alleged influence on America" is best omitted since it has little relevance.--K.J. 20:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I cleaned up the influence section a bit and tried to make it less blatantly contentious, but it's still far from balanced. I agree that it's not all that relevant either, it seems like someone just shoehorned it in so they could gripe about Republicans. If no one comes up with a good reason to keep it within the next few days, I say it should go. -- Colm O'Brien 17:49, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Francis Seow entry needs to be cleaned up but it should stay - it's an important small part of the bigger topic area ("political dissidents in Singapore") - dg, 23:12, 7 May 2006

Category:Singaporean tax evaders vs. Category:Purported Singaporean tax evaders[edit]

Were there a Category:Purported Singaporean tax evaders this might belong, but not to Category:Singaporean tax evaders. — Robert Greer (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reclassified as start[edit]

  • This article has been reclassified as a start due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 02:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Seow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Seow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]