Talk:Chiastic Slide

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

• http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Aogx7gjuro6ia

--CactusBot (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Removal request for section "Reception"

The "Reception" section features only about three sentences from professional reviews, while someone seems to have had a field day editing in more than two lengthy paragraphs worth of direct responses better fitted as responses under the respective reviews themselves, on their respective websites. The following sections should thus be removed:
1. "Of course, with music as radical and experimental as Autechre's, for a critic to lambaste an entire album because it was "too repetitive" borders on the absurd. Experimental music (even more so than standard music) can be judged only by the listener, and Allmusic has done a fine job of turning many a potential listener off from this unique, heartbreaking, and devastatingly human album in a few short sentences. Tim Barr's 'review' is much more neutral. Rather than attempting to objectively qualify the subjective experience of listening to experimental music, Barr simply describes the sound of the album - and in doing so, provides a much more worthwhile reference to the potential listener. Quite simply: does Barr's description sound intriguing? If so, then listen to this underrated gem of an album."
2. "Finally, the point is that Autechre is the cream of the crop of experimental music (not just experimental electronic music). Every album is a harvest reaped from a field every bit as fecund (if a bit more warped) than that of Lennon and McCartney."
3. "Chiastic Slide could be regarded as "transitional" in that it does not closely resemble the sound of its predecessor (Tri Repetae) or its successor (LP5). However, the term "transitional" only applies if the nature of the material is logically contiguous or continuous with the material that comes before or after it. This is not the case with Chiastic Slide. It is more of a stutter-step - a tentative beginning of a walk down a path that Autechre would, finally, come to tread with much success and gusto - but only after first returning to the more standard path of IDM for one last album (LP5). After LP5, however, Autechre seemed to have realized the stylistic dead end that they had arrived at. They gathered their gear, and with a single sigh, turned back around to the fork in the road. There they conjured, and through means unknown (how could one man's mind compass the creative monolith that is generated with Booth and Brown convene)created Confield, an album that was to experimental electronic music as Sun Ra was for jazz. Quite simply, from Confield on, Autechre ruthlessly interrogated every single parameter, every single genre signifier of electronic music. And yet somehow, during all this relentless experimentation, they conjured not just innovation but tremendous beauty as well. It is for this reason, the fact that Chiastic Slide, with its emphasis on textural exploration and musical deconstruction, represents the beginning of Autechre's slide from well-regarded electro/techno/IDM act to a beast entirely Other, a force of Alterity that robbed other electronic musicians of their barest ontological sufficiency. Quite simply, in the wake of Autechre's post Chiastic-Slide run of albums, electronic musicians were revealed for what they were: naked heirs-to-be for the emperor - but the Emperor not only has clothes, he rids the kingdom of Monarchy and in its place puts the monolithic government of pure aural mind-expansion."
--lmaxmai (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiastic Slide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724223228/http://www.themilkfactory.co.uk/reviews/autechre_chiasticslide.htm to http://www.themilkfactory.co.uk/reviews/autechre_chiasticslide.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)