Talk:GoldenEye

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGoldenEye has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starGoldenEye is part of the James Bond films series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 23, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 25, 2006Good article nomineeListed
December 15, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
January 9, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 22, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 1, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 24, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 30, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
November 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 20, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
June 30, 2016Good topic removal candidateDemoted
July 6, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
March 30, 2022Good topic removal candidateDemoted
September 27, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

"Irina(Bond Girl)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Irina(Bond Girl) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#Irina(Bond Girl) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RE: easter egg links[edit]

The simplest test for easter egg links, per WP:EASTEREGG: Also remember there are people who print the articles...In a print version, there is no link to select, and the reference is lost. DonQuixote (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see eastereggs regularly in plot sections, even in good articles, but in this instance I'm blaming Sjones23, who seemingly reverts to this version every few months whether it's warranted or not. I'm certainly guilty of restoring old versions of plots, but actively proofread to include any improvements. As they are a longtime contributor to many quality articles, I suppose it's their way of quick maintenance. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 22:17, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I often remove easter egg links as per WP:EGG and of course, I sometimes restore the plot summaries (including this one) to the ones that are less-than-700 words as per the relevant guidelines at WP:FILMPLOT, which says that summaries are 400 to 700 words only. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was harsh, clearly you've contributed a lot to this and many articles, it just looked to me like a rote revert, when the summary already met guidelines. Currently everything reads well. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 07:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I'm always trying to help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valentin Zukovsky[edit]

I believe it is Bond, not Wade, who suggests his meeting with Valentin Zukovsky. Even though I just watched the film, would like another editor to verify this and, if correct, make the slight correction. MartinLBuchanan (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]