Talk:Fram (ship)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PBS[edit]

There was just a great show on the Fram. It is quite important for the culture of Norway. It detailed tons of interesting facts; apparantly the hull is 80cm thick made of three layers of boards and 120 cm thick at the very front. The ship was very strongly and well built but obviously as the commment below suggests was not simply brute force but also an ingenius design. The show detailed Nansen's amazing struggle to try to achieve the north pole.

Timeplan/Goal of the artice: It would be nice if this arcticle was featured as a "did you know..."; main goal is for me to have it "done" (wikipedia articles are never done) until Roald Amundsen goes up on the fron page, March 7. — Sverdrup (talk) 11:21, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I think the Fram was not so strong, in fact it was built with lighter stucture than previous polar ships but it's shape makes that the resulting force of ice pressure pushed the boat upwards. Ericd 13:00, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)

File:Amundsen-Fram.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Amundsen-Fram.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If there's anyone in Norway near the Fram museum...[edit]

I think an establishing shot of the overall ship outside of water would be a great help to this article, since that was its main departure from regular ship making 24.136.136.42 (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FRAM[edit]

Benjamin (talk) 10:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Benjaminikuta: As I said here, we don't need a hatnote to that page in mainspace. If anything, it belongs in Fram (disambiguation). –MJLTalk 15:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? For example, Sysop. Benjamin (talk) 17:20, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's a major policy on Wikipedia. WP:FRAM is not even close to being as important in the long term. [Not to mention that the controversy is mentioned in our coverage here] –MJLTalk 17:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then we can link there. What's the problem? Benjamin (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There is no problem if we're linking there (and not here). –MJLTalk 05:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, I meant TO there. Benjamin (talk) 07:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fram (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]