Talk:St Patrick's Athletic F.C.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2001-2002 League Title[edit]

FAI does not recognise the 2001-02 league title due to a 15 point deduction for an inelegable player. As such since the FAI runs the league and keeps the records for the league, I am deferring to their decision until they rule otherwise, I do realise that the club has this title posted on their website and that they consider them self the title winner, but as that is a club decision and not a league decision I cant not accept it, and it will summarily be removed.--Boothy443 | comhrÚ 19:45, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps it should be listed with an asterisk and the explanation you've provided so that both sides position is available. Tufflaw 19:54, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
It's breifly mentioned in the article, maybe should be expanded, but not on the list of titles, they got docked enough points that they droped into the 3rd spot, putting in the league titles section, even with an *, would give some kinda of ligiticmay to their claim.
Maybe this might be a good compromise -
== Honours ==
  • League titles 1951-52, 1954-55, 1955-56, 1989-90, 1995-96, 1997-98, 1998-99
It should be noted that while the club claims to have won the 2001-02 league title, the FAI does not recognize this claim due to a 15 point deduction for an ineligible player
What do you think? Tufflaw 22:13, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
I am still not convinced that it should be placed in the league title section, i am going to do some invesgation and see if i can't come up with more information. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:52, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok so here is some information i was able to find

Premier Division

Final Table:

1.Shelbourne                33 19  6  8 50-28 63  Champions
2.Shamrock Rovers           33 17  6 10 54-32 57  UEFA Cup
3.Saint Patrick's Athletic  33 20  8  5 59-29 53  [*1]
4.Bohemians                 33 14 10  9 57-32 52
5.Derry City                33 14  9 10 42-30 51
6.Cork City                 33 14  7 12 48-39 49
7.University College Dublin 33 12 12  9 40-39 48
8.Bray Wanderers            33 12 10 11 54-45 46
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9.Longford Town             33 10 10 13 41-51 40  Relegation Playoff
-------------------------------------------------
10.Dundalk                   33  9 12 12 37-46 39  Relegated
11.Galway United             33  5  4 24 28-73 19  Relegated
12.Monaghan United           33  2  6 25 19-85 12  Relegated
[*1] full official name runs 'St. Patrick's Athletic incorporating St. Francis';
    the club had 9 points deducted due to fielding an ineligible player (Paul
    Marney) in their first 3 games of the season, but this decision has been
    revoked upon arbitration, and Shelbourne's appeal against that thrown out
    by the High Court;
    on March 22, they had 15 points deducted for playing Charles Mbabazi 
    Livingstone in the first 5 matches of the season in spite of not having 
    registered him until September 12, 2001; Shelbourne are Premier League champions for 2001/2002                
    after the FAI arbitration panel rejected St. Pats. appeal
    the merger between St. Patrick's and St. Francis collapsed during the
    season.
I sitill have a problem with the a lsiting in the club honors, but would add an expaneded portion about the point deductions during the season in the artile and putting a mark on the full league champs stating that Shelbourne won the league because of the deduction. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:43, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Userbox for fans[edit]

To add this box to your userpage, type ((user pats)) with { instead of ( etc Dodge 00:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]



Joseph Ndo, Notable Players[edit]

Ndo was included on the list of notable players. However, as he is still a part of the team, I removed him from the list. I wanted to make sure my actions were explained before someone goes and reverts it. Che84 05:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Kelleher[edit]

Can people please stop putting in bits about Pats becoming "the richest club in Ireland", its nothing but 'paper talk. Anything related to Kelleher or the take over should be referenced 62.77.181.12 14:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Cup 2008/09[edit]

Please note that the games against Elfsborg were not (as stated) in the first round of the Uefa Cup, but qualifiers. By winning the tie St Patrick´s actually qualified for the first round.Zamora1934 (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Season[edit]

Anyone willing to do a 2010 season for Pats? Dundalk and Bohs have one up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.11.73 (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Patrick's Athletic F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Patrick's Athletic F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Academy[edit]

St Patrick's Athletic is not a place to develop young talent, its only objective is to find players from other clubs already at a highly developed phase and poach these kids with false promises of senior football and yet as these kids get injured along the way they are basically abandoned while the club goes out and replace them with yet more kids being offered the same carrot and meantime the injured players are left to fend for themselves, I would advise anyone thinking of taking a player to this club to look at other alternatives who have development and welfare as the cornerstone of their academy's 95.44.47.126 (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu[edit]

Goalkepar 116.71.5.54 (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]