User talk:Max Terry
The talk page of Maxwell H. Terry.
If you add a new parameter to a parameterized template, then it's your responsibility to go through all the linked-to articles and add that parameter if it's missing, even if it's blank. Otherwise it will render as {{{producer}}}. A bummer, I know. Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 10:04, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
You should at least inform us about adding this !!!!Vorash 15:27, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
is there a way to make the parameterized field either render or not, depending if the parameter is blank or not? that would rock and people like me wouldn't have to sift through 30,000 movies adding empty parameters, to make them compatible with new fields like music or awards. shuff 20:19, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
Go to Talk:Stanley Kubrick, and see what the To-do list says about a possible merger.
Template:Steven Spielberg's films[edit]
Hello. I see you have previously edited Template:Steven Spielberg's films. The template has been nominated for deletion: you obviously see its value, so your vote would be helpful. Cheers. The JPS 1 July 2005 23:03 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:2001Cover.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
- It's not used anymore so I have no objection to this image being deleted. Conch Shell 09:41, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Directors templates[edit]
Max, as much as I am in favour of the concept of these templates, some people have chosen to make wikipedia less functional and user friendly by deleting them. The original Kurbirck template was deleted at the beginning of this week (along with Hitch & Spielberg). I wish you'd contributed to the debate on the original TFD. It was very close. The JPS 22:27, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Image:FullmetaljacketCover.jpg has been listed for deletion[edit]
| An image or media file you uploaded, Image:FullmetaljacketCover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
Usurp[edit]
I, Maxwell Terry, would like to rename this account from "Max Terry" to "Maxwell" (current user has 0 edits).
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10[edit]
Hi. When you recently edited Create, read, update and delete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]
As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
- This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Max Terry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Max Terry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Max Terry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Ludwig van listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ludwig van. Since you had some involvement with the Ludwig van redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)