Talk:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abortion

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

POV Dispute: The author is clearly pro-choice, and statements such as, "many women were simply lied to," unless backed by specific examples, need revising or elimination. Slambodog

For the confusing tags, I'm going to take of the "neutral point of view", but am going to leave the NPOV up. A cleanup tag might help, too. Fadetoblack 05:35, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I have rewritten the article. It now describes the specific decision the title refers to. The previous version, besides being heavily biased, didn't address this specific decision, but refered to provisions in numerous abortion-related decisions. I have removed the NPOV and cleanup tags, as I don't think they are needed any longer. IANAL, so anyone that is, please edit boldly. Kenj0418 06:02, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)