Talk:Stockwell tube station

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	September 6, 2019

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I'm sure Stockwell opened long before 1971 - wasn't it the original terminus for the City and South London railway back in 1890? -Timrollpickering 09:36, Feb 11 2004 (UTC)

I think the deep level shelter is used for archive storage like most of them. When I last looked (about 4 years ago) it was - the Studley Road entrance is the main entrance with signage etc- the other is for emergencies. Secret london 23:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Stockwell tube station/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have assessed this article as Start class.

To reach B class more work is needed.

It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. = No
It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. = yes
It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. = yes
It is free from major grammatical errors. =yes
It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. = yes

Comments:- Article is unreferenced, this needs to be corrected before the article can progress to B class. Mjroots (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)