Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zivinbudas/Proposed decision

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
• Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 3 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Editing limited

1) Pending final resolution of this matter User:Zivinbudas is limited in editing to his user pages and this arbitration. Any other edits which are obviously Zivinbudas (which exhibit immature Lithuanian nationalism) may be removed.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 13:44, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
2. Ambi 14:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. mav 04:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
4. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:07 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Lithuanian nationalism

1) Zivinbudas (talk · contribs) edits from an immature Lithuanian nationalist perspective [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 13:39, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
2. I'm not sure that this is the best way to word this, but yeah. Ambi 14:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 July 1, 2005 04:09 (UTC)
4. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:08 (UTC)
5. sannse (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC) What Ambi said
6. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Anonymous ips

2) When User:Zivinbudas is blocked he uses a wide range of ips to log in. Blocking the range might affect access of Lithuanian users to Wikipedia. Anonymous ips used by Zivinbudas include 85.206.194.242 (talk · contribs), 85.206.193.233 (talk · contribs), and 85.206.193.205 (talk · contribs).

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 13:39, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
2. Ambi 14:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 July 1, 2005 04:09 (UTC)
4. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:08 (UTC)
5. sannse (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
6. 15:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

Outlawed

1) User:Zivinbudas is banned for one year. Any edit by Zivinbudas using an anonymous ip (exhibiting his trademark immature Lithuanian nationalism) may be removed by any user.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 13:55, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
2. Ambi 14:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 July 1, 2005 04:09 (UTC)
4. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:08 (UTC)
5. sannse (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
6. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

1) Bans of User:Zivinbudas shall run for one year. At the end of each year they shall expire, but may be imposed for an additional year by any administrator if the usual pattern of immature Lithuanian nationalism persists. An appeal may be considered should the ban be imposed without adequate cause. Any appeal should be made at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 13:55, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
2. →Raul654 July 1, 2005 04:09 (UTC)
3. ➥the Epopt 9 July 2005 13:09 (UTC)
4. sannse (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
5. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

There is no problem with being proud of your Lithuanian heritage; there is a big problem with acting silly in a public forum. Fred Bauder 15:26, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. This seems a pretty straghtforward one. I think we are all done here. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 16:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
2. Close ➥the Epopt 16:59, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
3. →Raul654 18:05, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
4. Agreed sannse (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
5. Close Fred Bauder 23:11, July 21, 2005 (UTC)