Talk:Lake-effect snow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Maybe we should have an article on snowbelts too, detail hereThadk 19:42, 2004 Jun 14 (UTC)

I added snowbelt into my revision. There seems to be opinions not backed up with facts throughout the article. I have marked where citations are useful and/or needed for those occurances. And another thing: Just who calls lake effect snow 'The Great Grey Funk?' Must be a Canadian/Midwest thing. Like mispronouncing the letter 'O' or calling carbonated beverages 'POP' rather than 'SODA.'216.170.144.5 12:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've live in an area that receives a lot of Lake Effect snow (West Michigan) and have never heard anybody call lake effect "The Great Grey Funk". I don't know where that came from. On the other hand, I prefer "pop" over "soda". Phizzy (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is a local term in some US areas. User:CuffX 03:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic[edit]

I question whether the animated graphic accompanying this article really depicts lake effect snow as it is classically seen. Perhaps it would be better to replace it with a graphic that depicts the typical diagonal bands of intense snowfall associated with the lake effect. --A user

I agree, the graphics shows a radar image depicting a squall line passing through with multicellular clustered bands of snow which look like more of a synoptic phenomenon. Steep height falls are often found behind a cold front with an intensifying cyclone, and residual warm air near the surface can be mixed upwards to generate synoptic snow squalls, so the animation is not depicting lake effect snow at all but rather another similar phenomenon. The more traditional "classic" linear banded snow squall are far more representative of lake effect snow and much easier to visualize and understand. The animation at present is also very choppy and hard for most people with no weather related background to follow. Theonlysilentbob 06:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the graphic, added in a new loop, this image also shows the historic lake effect storm which crippled Buffalo, October 12 - 13 2006. I also linked it into the Lake Effect Storm Aphid article. Theonlysilentbob 03:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the graphic rapidly blinking white? I can't even see the picture, and I've had to cover it with my hand to read the article.Gingerwiki (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Western Edge of Lake Erie Snow Belt[edit]

Lake effect snow: Hey, ya reverted me edit. I grew up in Ashtabula County, Ohio in the NE corner of OH and I assure you that we get a inordinate amount of snow. No one considers it a suburb of Cleveland--an hour+ east of Cleveland. Mentor, maybe, not 'bula. Cheers. --Thadk 18:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mentor, Kirtland, Painesville, Eastlake, and places like that were what I meant. Ashtabula is also in the snow belt, but isn't the western edge of it. I used to live in Lake County, and had friends who lived in Euclid, and when the lake effect snow would come ashore, there would be a profound difference in the snowfall level across a sharp edge measured in a few blocks. One side would get two or three inches; the other would get the full dumping that the snow belt gets. Susan Davis 18:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not wishing to get too localized about where the lake effect is worse - why does it seem to be localized to the Great Lakes region? Can someone explain why it is less common elsewhere (particularly internationally)? It it a small area of water effect? Freshwater only? C'mon lets see some research. --97.95.33.234 (talk) 04:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lake effect redirect[edit]

Hi everyone, I suggest we should break the lake effect snow topic away from the lake effect redirect.

The whole issue is because the term “lake effect” simply refers to any atmospheric phenomenon which is a result of a lake. For example, the oasis effect is a lake effect phenomenon which occurs in the summer. There may also be lake induced thunderstorms which are September/October events and of course, lake effect rain which while very similar to snow is still not snow.

Just my 2 cents.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lake_effect"

I would concur (as a life-long resident of Erie County, NY) that "lake effect" should not be a redirect to only the snow aspect. I think also of lake effect cooling in the spring, lake effect warming in the fall, but probably most prominently, lake effect thunderstorms as well. Joe (talk) 19:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snow Squall Redirect[edit]

The term snow squall also redirects to this lake effect snow topic, I suggest this be changed since many snow squalls do occur throughout the world in winter weather environments from mesoscale forcing along trofs or waves and the term itself is highly generic referring to blinding snows. Thus while lake effect snow is a form of a snow squall there are many different types of snow squalls which are not just lake effect in nature such as the squalls which disrupted Dallas Texas in March of 2004.

Then do so. Go to the snow squall article, remove the redirect, and create an article that differentiates between Lake Effect and snow squalls that occur due to significant height falls outside of lake effect areas. As long as you include Lake effect in a See Also section, all should be well. Thegreatdr 19:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contents[edit]

this part is messed up. (look at it) would someone who knows what they are doing fix it?

Do you mean, the table of contents? That's automatically generated, we can't do anything about it (other than maybe hide it). Or do you mean the actual content of the article, in which case you should be more specific. -- dcclark (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the comment refers to the text above the Contents? That text (which is messed up) is:

In order for lake effect rain or snow to form the temperature difference between the water temperature between the surface and 850 mb should be at least 13 °C.

The "What is lake effect snow?" link presumably has the original text from which the above is derived. I think it should be something like:

In order for lake effect rain or snow to form, the moving air needs to be cooler and less humid than the surface air. Specifically, the air temperature should be 15 to 25 °C cooler than the water, and the dew point at an altitude where the air pressure is 850 mb should be 13 °C lower than the dew point of the air at the surface.

Research on past revisions of "messed up" sentence[edit]

For several revs back in spring of 2006, the sentence read:
"In order for Lake Effect rain or Snow to form the temperature difference between the water and the air at 1500 meters above the surface must be at least 13 degrees C."

A rev on July 10 by Rsholmes changed this to:
"In order for lake effect rain or snow to form the temperature difference between the water and the air should be 15C to 25C, and the difference in the dew point between the surface and 850 mb should be at least 13 degrees C." I presume the "850 mb" means the altitude where the air pressure is 850 mb, as noted above.

Next rev: "In order for lake effect rain or snow to form the temperature difference between the water temperature between the surface and 850 mb should be at least 13 °C." This is from Nov. 5 and Thegreatdr. It seems this is the faulty sentence.

I just copied the suggestion, and I'll be inserting it, subject to more online research. As a recent inhabitant of a region subject to lake-effect weather, the topic is of personal interest.
 Schweiwikist • (t)  17:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

Very little about Canada on this page. The lake effect in the Great Lakes region doesn't stop at the border. 209.20.2.6 19:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't be an NPOV problem -- the article is correct and unbiased concerning the areas it covers. The article simply needs to be expanded. -- dcclark (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While it's not actually NPOV, but rather an example of systematic bias, I do not see why lake-effect snow outside of the USA and Canada is referred to as International. 194.73.121.7 (talk) 19:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

move[edit]

I've moved the page to put in the hyphen. I've fixed the double redirects, but so far only a few of the links to the non-hyphenated title. I'll be back to attend to those over the next few days. Michael Hardy 02:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, outside of small portions of Ontario, the United States i.e. the great lakes region is the ONLY area that expericences lake-effect snow. The Great Salt Lake scenario is a crock. No where else in the world experiences this. You should all commint suicide for even having this conversation.

The great lakes undoubtedly produce the most profound lake effect precipitation events due to their location, size and climate however lake effect and other similar phenomenon occur numerous other places throughout the globe but to a much lesser degree. Also due to the fact that climatologically speaking winds are primarily out of the NW for most of the winter season, Ontario sees far more snow squall activity over a much greater area than the U.S. If you don't believ me, take a look at this graphic [1] Theonlysilentbob 05:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When a comment ends with "you should all commit suicide...", I think it's safe to assume it's a troll and we can all ignore the comment. Wait for someone willing to have a grown-up conversation. :P -- dcclark (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be generalized[edit]

The article focuses on an effect which occurs over many different types of bodies of water throughout the world. As presently written, it is almost entirely focused on the Great Lakes, although the other sites are mentioned further in the article. This is understandable as the effect has been most studied with respect to this region, but nonetheless, it is a global phenomenon. It is also well known along the shores of Lake Baikal, the Black Sea, the west coast of Japan, and even along the New England coastline, and occasionally even the coastline of Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. It even occurs OVER many bodies of water such as the Gulf Stream. I don't know how to best do this in the current article without completely revising it. One problem is that there is no generalized term for the same effect at the present time, as far as I know. Tmangray (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well the formation explanation among other things applies universally as do the effects, in most meteorological books this event is referred to as either lake, sea, ocean or bay effect snow however lake effect is the term used most often. It is for this reason there should be some redirects sending users who query the other terms to the lake effect article. The section titled Similar phenomena should be expanded to include the "global" aspect of the phenomenon and perhaps some technical images can be provided showing something such as bay effect giving readers an idea of how it differs from lake effect snow. Other than that I think most users will understand this phenomenon as something which is global and the basic thermodynamic formation and the impact these squalls have. There is another very general article dealing with snowsqualls, you might be interested in looking at that one as well.Theonlysilentbob (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Toyla is freaken awesome. ☻☺☻☺☻☺[reply]
The section International needs to be incorporated into the main part of the article. As it stands, it is written from a very US centric point of view. OliAtlason (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with warnings[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was no consensus to merge. Bilby (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that we merge the following articles into this one.

This information can easily be contained in this article without making it that much longer.

Do not support. This is an official advisory issues by the NWS, the rest of the products have their own article, so I see no reason to change it for these.
see: Template:SevWea nav WxGopher (talk) 04:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Windward?[edit]

The first sentence has the phrase "is deposited on the windward shores". I find this inexplicably false; windward is the direction from which the wind is blowing. Or have I missed something?

Jlittlenz (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think JLittlenz is correct, it should be leeward, as in downwind from. The picture accompanying this article shows the snow on the leeward side, and the article in the German wikipedia talks about the leeward side as well.
The change may have come from a confusing picture at Lee shore but that picture refers to an island so the directions of windward and leeward shores are reversed. See the comment made at the time:
 14:47, 23 June 2009 63.108.117.3  (talk) (26,034 bytes) (Wind is blowing from lee shore 
towards windward shore,  so  snow is deposited on windward shore, not on lee shore.) (undo)
I will change it. Tenbergen (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast Ohio[edit]

These maps are terribly inaccurate, the snow capital of Ohio, Chardon, isn't even shaded on these "Lake Effect Area Maps". Lake, Geauga, and Ashtabula counties need to be included. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.55.159 (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Edit donation from Severe weather[edit]

The same effect over bodies of salt water is called ocean effect snow,[1] sea effect snow,[2] or even bay effect snow.[3] The effect is enhanced when the moving air mass is uplifted by the orographic effect of higher elevations on the downwind shores. This uplifting can produce narrow, but very intense bands of precipitation, which is deposited at a rate of many inches of snow per hour and often brings copious snowfall totals. The areas affected by lake-effect snow are called snowbelts. This effect occurs in many locations throughout the world, but is best known in the populated areas of the Great Lakes of North America.[4]

If the air temperature is not low enough to keep the precipitation frozen, it falls as lake-effect rain. In order for lake-effect rain or snow to form, the air moving across the lake must be significantly cooler than the surface air (which is likely to be near the temperature of the water surface). Specifically, the air temperature at the altitude where the air pressure is 850 millibars (or 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi) altitude) should be 13 °C (24 °F) lower than the temperature of the air at the surface.[4] Lake-effect occurring when the air at 850 millibars is 25 °C (45 °F) colder than the water temperature can produce thundersnow, snow showers accompanied by lightning and thunder (due to the larger amount of energy available from the increased instability).[5]

This information was included in the Severe weather article and is not needed there but may be of use here. Respectfully ~~

References

  1. ^ Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences (2008). "Ocean Effect Snow over the Cape (Jan 2, 2008)". Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 2009-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ Stephen Nicholls (2005-03-31). "Analysis of Sea Effect Snow Banding over Japan". University of New York State University at Albany. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  3. ^ National Weather Service Forecast Office in Wakefield, Virginia (2000-05-11). "Chesapeake Bay Effect Snow Event of December 25, 1999". Eastern Region Headquarters. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  4. ^ a b Greg Byrd (1998). "Lake-Effect Snow". COMET. Retrieved 2009-06-15.
  5. ^ Jack Williams (2006-05-05). Warm water helps create Great Lakes snowstorms. USA Today. Retrieved on 01-11-2006.

North of Iran[edit]

In Feb 2005 and Jan 2008 South-western parts of Caspian sea in North of Iran faced with a very heavy snow fall (Rasht: 180 cm in 2005 and 150 cm in 2008 & Anzali port: 210 cm in 2008). But I couldn't find any information about this matter in this page --Nhrpress (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LES in Upper Michigan[edit]

"A very large snowbelt in the United States is the one in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, near the cities of Houghton, Marquette, and Munising. These areas average 250–300 inches (635–762 cm) of snow each season." Isn't this very exaggerated? Marquette averages "only" 113.8 inches, while Munising receives 151 inches and Houghton 218; the snowiest place in the state is the Twin Lakes area which averages 242 inches. There are no places in the state that officially average more than 250 inches; and even if they are, here we are talking about large areas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.44.45.128 (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think what might be meant is that some rural place (which isn't a town, as your examples are) can average that much snow. However, the source currently attached to that statement doesn't appear to actually say that 250-300 is an average. It says that it can average above 200, and one year a location had 391.9 inches. I think a better/different source, or simply saying over 200, is in order. Chris857 (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Best HD Video of Lake Effect forming in Buffalo N.Y. from Lake Erie - Nov 18 2014[edit]

Here is a 10 second 1080i clip of the formation of Lake effect snow forming in Buffalo, NY from Lake Erie on November 18, 2014. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4anGNMxR6B4 Recorded snowfall levels can be obtained from Buffalo's local news reporting websites (WIVB.com, WKBW.com, and WGRZ.com, also the National Weather Service). I would update the article but I am unfamiliar with formatting here on wikipedia. Japreja (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lake-effect snow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake-effect snow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lake-effect snow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Lake-effect snow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lake-effect_snow&oldid=1203468628"