Talk:Runesocesius

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Serious editing[edit]

All of these articles on Lusitanian deities are in need of serious editing. Unfortunately, I have no resources available regarding the mythology of the Lusitanians and thus am not able to do more than correct some of the spelling and grammar. Please feel free to expand this article in any way you can.

I can find no credible sources that this deity even existed. Can anyone else? Paul S (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I can find him: Bulletin de la Société des Antiquaires de la France, 1899 pp. 269-273 by someone (Portuguese) calling himself J.L. de V. He describes a Roman dedication SANCTRVNESOCESIOSACRVGLIC...QVINTCINV...BALS which he interprets at containing two Celtic elements *run- meaning "mystery" and cesius as an allograph for 'gaesius' from *gaiso- meaning a spear or javelin. Hence this "mysterious javelin god". How is he part of a trinity, though? Can anyone else discover more? Paul S (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It all becomes clear: someone's Spanish is even worse than mine (which is saying something) 91.84.79.51 (talk) 11:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War[edit]

95.69.111.27 reverts all my changes without explanation, putting them back to unsourced neo-Pagan fluffy-bunniness. Reversions reverted, and the admins will have to sort it out. Paul S (talk) 15:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Editing[edit]

Okay, re-written again, hopefully there are now enough sources and explanations and the article is now completely neutral. The amount of debate this obscure god is generating is all out of proportion to what we know about him. Paul S (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Do have in consideration that [1] [2] the Tartessian language is also open to debate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.77.101 (talk) 01:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, nobody's 100% sure what Tartessian was. A year or two ago someone said they could read it as Celtic, but I've heard nothing else on that since then and imagine that this theory sank without trace in the end. I don't think I've heard anyone suggest that Tartessian was Lusitanian, though. Paul S (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]