Talk:Schumann resonances

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSchumann resonances was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 31, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

References[edit]


Chimney ranking[edit]

This section refers to the African "chimney" and other chimneys, without explaining what a chimney is supposed to be. Wi thout an explanation, the section might as well be LLM gibberish. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this context, apparently continental "chimneys" refer to zones of increased lightning flash density[1] . The highest lightning activity globally can be found in the Congo basin[2] forming one of those zones.
But I could not find any other source than the aforementioned Williams2004 to use the term "chimney" for those zones. Kerel-fs (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Williams, E.R; Sátori, G (2004). "Lightning, thermodynamic and hydrological comparison of the two tropical continental chimneys". Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 66 (13–14): 1213–1231. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2004.05.015.
  2. ^ Christian, Hugh J.; Blakeslee, Richard J.; Boccippio, Dennis J.; Boeck, William L.; Buechler, Dennis E.; Driscoll, Kevin T.; Goodman, Steven J.; Hall, John M.; Koshak, William J.; Mach, Douglas M.; Stewart, Michael F. (2003-01-16). "Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 108 (D1). doi:10.1029/2002JD002347. ISSN 0148-0227.

Broken link[edit]

The first reference (Schumann Resonance from NASA) is a broken link, it redirects to the plain NASA website. I don't know if maybe Internet Archive has a saved version of the original reference or not, but thought I'd make note of that here in case someone has the time to look into that, as I don't. Moony483 (talk) 03:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14.1 or 14.3?[edit]

You notice the image and the description have differing frequencies for the second order resonance? 2409:4073:200E:8B30:44C9:3771:2DD5:26B (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the third frequency, which the text gives as 20.8 and the image shows as 20.3. Actually, the image has larger problems: the colors in the key were mixed up when the image was convereted from PNG to SVG, thus the frequencies are labeled wrongly. Do I remove the image? Notify the author? I'll leave that up to more experienced editors. Msittig (talk) 21:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those frequencies vary with sea level, weather, and solar activity. In other words: that 14.x Hz frequency is not a constant. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]