Talk:Norton Juster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attribution[edit]

209.191.166.202 is me -- a switch to en2 logged me out without my realizing it. -- Scarequotes 21:32, Oct 14, 2003 (UTC)


Books[edit]

This article is great, but wouldn't it be more appropriate to have his two most notable books listed as seperate articles? Most other author articles I've seen do this, and I think it'd be a good idea here too. Also, that way a search for "The Phantom Tollbooth" would get an exact hit. What does everyone else think? —Frecklefoot 18:24, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)

It's a good idea. I'll probably pursue it in the next couple of days. (That's why I added biographical info on a revision -- I'd like a little more meat before I remove the bulk of the article.) There's already a page for The Phantom Tollbooth, which I'm going to add to regardless. -- Scarequotes 18:48, Oct 15, 2003 (UTC)

Stark Naked[edit]

I've found this for sale with the subtitle "A Paranomastic Odyssey" (is this a misspelling of paronomastic? If so, is the misspelling intentional?), but I also see citations as "A Paranormal Odyssey." I suspect the latter is an error. Can anyone confirm or refute the actual title of this work? Krychek 16:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Krycheck, I am looking at the book right now, your spelling is correct. I am not sure it's a word, but it might be Juster's blending of Panorama and Paranoia. Paronomastic as you may know means play on words or punning so I think Juster just took it a little further.

By the way, when I did my update to the Stark Naked citation, I meant to say 'Add' Library of Congress Number but in the dark of my keyboard I typed 'Ass' Library of Congress... Freudian Slip?.

Botendaddy (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Passing of Irving"[edit]

I'm afraid I don't understand why there's a reference to an unpublished book here. MrDarwin 16:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Norton Juster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Vandalism/Biographies of Living Persons Policy[edit]

This article has serious fact issues. I think it needs a rewrite or at least some serious work that I don't want to commit to doing. There's a lot of unsourced or badly sourced material here (see the claim about Minnie Mouse being his mother) and, while most of it is sourced with pages from one book, I've already found evidence of sources that don't support the claims (the Scholastic biography). Unfortunately, I don't have access to a copy of the book being cited to verify the claims. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to fix this/bring it into compliance with Biographies of Living Persons. Stellarnebula (talk) 17:51, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious vandalism can just be removed as I have done. The poor sourcing is more difficult but that's no reason not to deal with the vandalism for now. If it continues then take a look at WP:RFPP. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Alright thank you! Stellarnebula (talk) 13:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phantom Tolbooth[edit]

Who knew that a phantom toll booth was a prison of your mind? Who knew the moral of the story is to free your mind?

Do you think I'm wrong?

I think it's the biggest grinner to show up in a while. I read this about 1,000 years ago when I was still a child.  Then and now, children and adults and fossils think that the title means different. There are no discussions about it.

If you were to look it up, the word tolbooth, in a Webster's dictionary perhaps on page 1215 if you're lucky, you might see that a toll booth is a Scottish prison or jail. I wish our author was still around. I bet you this conversation would give him the biggest grin. He probably crossed over grinning over this hidden fact. 107.127.18.21 (talk) 07:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]