Talk:Distributed shared memory

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earlier comment[edit]

how about numa, and the Altix? it does fall in shared memory category doesn't it?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.138.64.171 (talk • contribs) (19:27, 21 March 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NUMA is not DSM[edit]

NUMA and DSM are distinct. With NUMA a node can access memory elsewhere albeit less quickly than local memory. With DSM a node cannot directly access memory elsewhere. To access another node's memory it must engage the other node's cooperation (e.g., via messages). To ensure that all nodes have a coherent view of memory, now that's where things get interesting ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.114.69 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 7 June 2005 (UTC) ‎[reply]

The 2011 edition of Hennessy and Patterson, Computer architecture : a quantitative approach says on page 348 that "A DSM [Distributed Shared Memory] multiprocessor is also called a NUMA (nonuniform memory access), since the access time depends on the location of a data word in memory." So perhaps our article needs to be updated or changed to agree with modern reliable sources. JonH (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delphi?[edit]

The "Delphi" link goes to Delphi programming language; the linked article mentions nothing about distributed shared memory. This leads me to believe the Delphi that's an example of DSM is not the same as the Delphi programming language. A Google search turns up this paper, which is about a distributed shared memory system called Delphi and doesn't mention Borland afaict. Anyone know what's going on?

Cjoev 01:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link is broken. I intended to fix it, but I forgot about it. Of course it should link to new entry about DSM Delphi system, and NOT about Borland Delphi.

Szopen 09:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MOSIX[edit]

Mosix does not support DSM, it migrates memory from node to node, but a process can't access memory of any other node beside its hosting one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.65.96.97 (talk) 07:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Distributed shared memory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517101209/http://www.sharedcache.com/ to http://www.sharedcache.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]