Talk:Bački Petrovac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I'm not sure, but shouldn't this be titled Backi Petrovac per the official name? --Joy [shallot] 13:08, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No[edit]

!abyhc

In Slovak it's Petrovec (without 'Báčsky') - in Serbian it's Bački Petrovac.

!niaga ,abyhc

"Ó zdravo teta, ako ste?"

my work here's done.

Official name[edit]

Majority of inhabitants are Slovaks. Slovak is one of official languages in Vojvodina. So it should be Petrovec.

Removed image(s)[edit]

Certian images have been removed by me because they have been added to a category that makes them speediable, most likely Category:Images with no copyright tag. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 16:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request[edit]

"Disambiguation" discussion at Talk: Petrovec (continued here)[edit]

The disambiguation is necesary, the name Petrovec is used by Slovakians who consist the majority, as far as i know it's official and widely used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakronian (talkcontribs) 19:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This disambiguation page is completely unnecessary because the name Petrovec is only used in the village and municipality of Petrovec. The one in Serbia is spelled Petrovac, and there is already a Petrovac disambiguation page. But since the Slovakians spell it as Petrovec, then a dablink should be put at the top of the page. --The Last King of Brush Park 21:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Slovakians are the majority and the Slovak language is official in Vojvodina, the name Petrovec is as common as Bački Petrovac, it's not just a different spelling or pronunciation by the locals. Also we are talking about a town with 10 times the population of the Macedonian village. If we are interested in what most wikipedia visitors would want to find by searching for "Petrovec" it surely isn't completely unnecessary. Why should the "Petrovac" disambiguation page have anything to do with this matter ??? --Zakronian (talk) 23:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sure, great, terrific, awesome. But what do you think about my idea of a dablink? --The Last King of Brush Park 01:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If we throw out Petrovec Municipality, we could redirect "Petrovec" to "Petrovec, Republic of Macedonia" (or Macedonian village) and add a dablink there. Although leaving the disambiguation page, at least for a while, would be more neutral, since there hasn't been any broader agreement for the important changes so far.--Zakronian (talk) 04:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that sounds like a good idea. But I see no reason to leave the disambiguation page for even a little while. --The Last King of Brush Park 15:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you do it now i will copy-paste this discussion to Talk:Bački Petrovac so that other editors might add their opinions and decide changes.--Zakronian (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. --The Last King of Brush Park 20:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bački Petrovac. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]