Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-thug

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 14:24, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

E-thug

Dictdef (at best). --fvw* 01:17, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)

• Delete or else to be sent to Wiktionary. -Svest 01:39, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
• E-delete. Neologism. I doubt Wiktionary will want it. android↔talk 03:42, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
  • As a matter of fact, Wiktionary explicitly deals with the notion of prefixing "e-" to every word under the sun in its criteria for inclusion. Uncle G 14:46, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 05:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism, original research. Gazpacho 05:33, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, heavy point of view. Looks like somebody doesn't like being bullied on the internet. Nestea 02:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, reasons above. Adm58 07:11, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We already have thug. utcursch | talk 10:26, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.