Talk:Uwe Kils

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2005Articles for deletionKept
November 27, 2009Articles for deletionKept
December 8, 2009Articles for deletionSpeedily kept

Notability?[edit]

I tried to find good secondary sources for notability, but didn't really find very much to support the rough guidelines in WP:PROF:

1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
A search on Web of Knowledge turned up only 15 publications, so I was wondering if Kils has impacted the field in any other way that isn't reflected in publications.
2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
The Heinz Meier Leibnitz Prize is a regular award for young scientist, which are pretty common. I don't think it really qualifies as exceptional.
3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE).
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this. He may have held a Heisenberg Fellowship, but that is a pretty common source of funding for early-stage scientists, rather than a 'prestigious membership'.
4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this. The most senior title is found was 'associate professor'.
6. The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
7 The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.
This may be true, but I found no evidence for this.
9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC.
Does not apply to marine biology. If he is notable as a photographer, he should be credited as such, rather than as a biologist.

Any clarification of the above points (with sources) would be much appreciated. Thanks! 109a152a8a146 (talk) 21:26, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]