User talk:132.205.15.43

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice
• The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
• Your own user page
• Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
• The ability to rename pages
• The ability to upload images
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website
• The eligibility to become an administrator
• The right to be heard in votes and elections
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia as a Wikipedian! —Phoenixrod 00:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Popcat

Template:Popcat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Dr. Submillimeter 19:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of METEOR unit

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on METEOR unit, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because METEOR unit is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting METEOR unit, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Andorian ships

I have nominated Category:Andorian ships (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 19:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Vulcan ships

I have nominated Category:Vulcan ships (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 19:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Suliban ship classes

I have nominated Category:Suliban ship classes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 19:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Andorian ship classes

I have nominated Category:Andorian ship classes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Romulan ships

I have nominated Category:Romulan ships (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Minerva class battleship

An editor has nominated Minerva class battleship, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minerva class battleship and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of NEUA

I have nominated NEUA, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEUA (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Triona (talk) 12:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Leo (mobile suit)

An editor has nominated Leo (mobile suit), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo (mobile suit) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Boeing7x7

A tag has been placed on Template:Boeing7x7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J-class starship

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article J-class starship, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vira

A tag has been placed on Vira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 03:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:After War

I have nominated Category:After War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:After War Gundam X (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 23:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cleancat

Template:Cleancat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 01:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2020 Summer Olympics

The article 2020 Summer Olympics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

per WP:CRYSTAL; "The International Olympic Committee has yet to begin the selection process, "

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 14:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manchuria (region)

The article Manchuria (region) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of more comprehensive Manchuria article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quigley (talk) 22:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Minerva class battleship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minerva class battleship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minerva class battleship(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem 10:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kou Kawarajima

The article Kou Kawarajima has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A self-published dōjinshi group. Dōjinshi (self-published comics) and their creators are rarely notable and there is no evidence from reliable third-party sources to demonstrate that this group is an exception. Fails both WP:CREATIVE and WP:NOTE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 02:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Sidewise Award winners

Category:Sidewise Award winners, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Semiregular variables

Category:Semiregular variables, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 20:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:White dwarfs

Category:White dwarfs, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sidewise Award winning authors

Category:Sidewise Award winning authors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of After War Gundam X mobile weapons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of After War Gundam X mobile weapons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of After War Gundam X mobile weapons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:Superbombs

Category:Superbombs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Connie Corleone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connie Corleone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Corleone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 02:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC) Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 02:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mobile Fighter G Gundam mobile suits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

PlayStation 9 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PlayStation 9. Since you had some involvement with the PlayStation 9 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  06:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Boxing Day tidal wave listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boxing Day tidal wave. Since you had some involvement with the Boxing Day tidal wave redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dawnseeker2000 18:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Universal Century has been nominated for discussion

Category:Universal Century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Astronomy images has been nominated for renaming

Category:Astronomy images has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

"Xenon (Xbox)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Xenon (Xbox) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#Xenon (Xbox) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

"NeXtBox" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NeXtBox and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 31#NeXtBox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corleone family

The article Corleone family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable topic for an independent article, insufficient reliable sources can be located discussing the family as a family, not as individuals. Should be redirected/merged to List of The Godfather characters. Primarily in-universe fluff.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Corleone family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corleone family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corleone family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 15:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 132.205.15.43. Thank you for your work on Population I star. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I had to reword much of the text which was directly cut and paste from:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Starlog/pop12.html

Please use your own words in future or you will be blocked and the articles deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Please disregard this message, the copyvio was the work of another editor. Cheers. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Population I star

Hello 132.205.15.43,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Population I star for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mobile Suit Gundam SEED images

A tag has been placed on Category:Mobile Suit Gundam SEED images indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

---