Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - not sure what to do with this one so I made it into a disambig page - SimonP 22:04, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Coverage[edit]

Nothing but a dictionary definition...any purpose outside wiktionary? --Jemiller226 02:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Dicdef. Transwiki if appropriate. -Rholton 13:18, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, useful technical term linked from many other pages. Potential to expand to explain factors affecting coverage, such as signal strength, geography, tall buildings, atmospheric factors etc. Kappa 00:11, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - useful technical dictionary definition, you mean. Transwiki if it's not been done, but there's no need for it to be here. Grutness|^hello? 06:16, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, dicdef. Transwiki.Ganymead 06:52, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.