Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contiguous

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:36, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

contiguous

Wiktionary had had Wiktionary:contiguous for 1 month prior to the creation of this article. There's no noun that this adjective could readily redirect to, and no scope for an encyclopaedia article. All hyperlinked instances of this word in Wikipedia were uses in its normal dictionary sense. Uncle G 12:19, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

• Delete. -- Infrogmation 17:51, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to continuity or similar. I think. Maybe. Perhaps. Alphax ^τεχ 18:07, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, already in Wiktionary. Megan1967 23:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect. -Sean Curtin 06:33, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete continuity doesn't really mean the same thing. - SimonP 23:36, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.