Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theocon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:50, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Theocon[edit]

Seems dangerously close to a neologism... been around for a while, but will this ever be more than a dicdef-style entry?Feco 20:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep Coming into fairly wide use. Google search for "theo-con OR theocon" tops 50,000 hits. More than a dicdef, b/c it defines a movement (and has been adopted to self-define by some within that movement). -- 8^D ^gab 21:00, 2005 Apr 11 (UTC)
Keep, as per 8^D. could and probably will expand (in fact, I'll go add a sentence or two myself). Meelar (talk) 21:32, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
Either Keep or Redirect to Christian Right. I've heard this term before, often on left-leaning weblogs, and it's in common enough currency that I do think it should at least be a redirect. Firebug 21:43, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to Christian Right. Megan1967 10:43, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Disagree with redirect - shall we then redirect Neoconservative to Conservative? -- 8^D ^gab 23:24, 2005 Apr 13 (UTC)
Keep -- and I speak as someone who has (inaccurately) been accused of being one of these. --Christofurio 23:32, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.