Talk:False Decretals

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Talk:Pseudo-Isidore where planning for the merge is starting. --FourthAve 12:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


This article on the False Decretals is somewhat outdated. The bibliography stops at the beginning of the 20th century. The Le Mans hypothesis is no longer tenable since Klaus Zechiel-Eckes has identified a number of manuscripts from the library of Corbie monastery which were undoubtedly used by the forgers. For a more or less up-to-date article on the subject see wikipedia s.v. Pseudo-Isidore. kgschon

Of course it is outdated - it is largely a copy from the Catholic Encyclopedia published in 1913. --Audiovideo 13:30, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)


This article appears to be identical in its subject with the article on Pseudo-Isidorian forgeries and the article on Pseudo-Isidore while only the sources appear to be different. Why not merge all three articles into one? -tlatosmd, June 21st 2005, 9:20pm CET

Sounds good to me, but I'm generally a lumper. Shall we hold the discussion at Talk:Pseudo-Isidorian forgeries? --Wetman 20:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

See Talk:Pseudo-Isidore where planning for the merge is starting. --FourthAve 12:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]