Talk:Animal embryonic development

Animal embryonic development was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 31, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Anatomy: Embryology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to embryology.

Biology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Biology portal Animal embryonic development is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 August 2020 and 25 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Akt79.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This article is very informative, but it deals only with mammalian development, blastocysts are exclusive to mammals. They can be, roughly, seen as the equivalent to the blastula in mammals, but they are not blastulas. I think this article should:

be renamed "mammalian embryogenesis" or something like that, blastocyst redirecting there.
a new embryogenesis article should deal with general embryogenesis, with morulas, blastulas, gastrulas, blastiocysts, etc. explaining the differences, which stage follows after each, etc.

if this is ok with everyone, i can try and do it (but starting tomorrow by night) --Tycho 20:50, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps you should keep this page as a disambiguation page and make mammalian embryogenesis a new page. Embryogenesis can then link to mamamalian, plant and drosophila embryogenesis. --nixie 23:50, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

- I have moved the page to mammalian embryogenesis to keep its histoty page, this talk page wasn't moved along with it.--Tycho 22:44, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hmm five years on and - either the page was moved back, or the page transformed back into a poorly structured article on mammalian embryogenesis(mostly, at least from "formation of the blastula" onwards). I doubt I'll get round to changing that though... Sean Heron (talk) 07:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

spelling mistake?[edit]

Cells start mayor differentiation processes, losing their pluripotentiality.

shouldn't mayor be major?

-where is the article's image? i thought i've seen it before but it got lost..

==[edit]

I believe the illustration on this page has some errors. The cells labeled ectoderm are actually the epiblast -- They will later become ectoderm after the primitive streak forms and gastrulation starts. The cells labeled endoderm are actually hypoblast celss -- They will be replaced by cells that migrate from the primative streak and THEN become endoderm. The layer of cells labeled mesoderm, is technically mesoderm but it is extraembryonic mesoderm -- it will form the chorion (and therefore part of the placenta). The embryonic mesoderm will be formed from cells in the primative streak and is located between the embryonic ectoderm and embryonic endoderm. Other than these errors the illustration is very clear and easy to understand -- is it possible for it to be corrected? --Dbrouse 22:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

embryology[edit]

would sympathtic editors consider a positive vote here? [1]Slrubenstein | Talk 15:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nominated[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

In short:

The lead is awkward and a poor introduction to the article, and the rest of the text is somewhat weak. It uses only two references, neither of which is particularly notable. It fails to put the process in context - not even a link to reproduction? Meiosis? Gastrulation section is biased towards Deuterostomes.

Needs a lot of work, I fear, but it is a good start. Adam Cuerden ^talk 11:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The definition of delamination is weak. Needs better wording. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.23.75.62 (talk) 12:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

embryology[edit]

Frist cell divisions of C. elegans.

Maybe, instead of (or additional to) showing the drawing which illustrates the cleavage, we could provide an example for this developmental stage? This WikiCommons movie should do it. Any comments/suggestions? Ptrrupprecht (talk) 16:41, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Comparative embryology of the vertebrates; with 2057 drawings and photos. grouped as 380 illus (1953) (20661197932).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Comparative embryology of the vertebrates; with 2057 drawings and photos. grouped as 380 illus (1953) (20661197932).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this article is only about animal embryonic development why is it called 'Embryonic Development' and not 'Animal Embryonic Development'.[edit]

The 'About' info at the top of the page currently states:

"This article is about embryogenesis of all animals. For human embryonic development, see Human embryonic development. For plant embryogenesis, see Plant embryogenesis."

Surely, then, this page should be called either "Animal Embryonic Development" or "Animal Embryogenesis".

Currently, it is called "Embryonic Development".

For consistency, maybe it would be nice if all 3 pages (Animal, Plant, and Human) used either "Embryonic Development" or "Embryogenesis" in the title.

Famedog (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE:

I changed the name to Animal Embryonic Development and someone changed it back calling it an "Unnecessary inclusion of 'animal'" and saying "See talk page", but I can't see anything on the talk page explaining this reversion.

Since there is a page about plant embryo development called 'Plant embryogenesis' and this page is specifically about animals, why shouldn't it have 'animal' in the title? It is not just animals that have embryos.

Famedog (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]