Talk:Piccadilly line

Piccadilly line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 2, 2020	Good article nominee	Not listed
November 16, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 15, 2020.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 200,000 children were evacuated via the Piccadilly line during World War II?

Current status: Good article

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK / in London Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	December 10, 2018

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as High-importance).

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Victoria line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Piccadilly line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is mainly a deep-level line, with a number of surface sections, mostly in its westernmost parts.[edit]

From the map it looks like most of it is above ground. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.103.159 (talk) 09:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The word "mainly" has been there since 2006, but I have changed it to "partly". --David Biddulph (talk) 10:40, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map legend needed[edit]

There either needs to be a map legend or a link to one. I don't know what the difference is between a station being presented as a circle and one presented as a tab to the side. Thisisnotatest (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear which map you're referring to. If it's the standard Wikipedia railway route map in the "list of stations" section, then try the word "Legend" at the top. Bazza (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]